Laserfiche WebLink
(-.. He described the program's background as utilized in Livermore and detailed the <br />technical aspects of sprinkler water distribution and response to a structure fire with the <br />sprinklers in place. In 25 of 26 activations in Livermore, the fire was neazly extinguished <br />by the time the Fire Department responded to the home. He noted that the costs have <br />risen slightly because of material issues, ranging from $1.00 to $1.50 per squaze foot. <br />Large custom homes could cost up to $3.00 per squaze foot because of vaulted ceilings. <br />He noted that a home with no sprinklers generally has 20-30 times the damage of a home <br />with sprinklers. <br />In response to an inquiry by Commissioner Blank regarding mortality in homes with and <br />without sprinklers, Mr. Carlson confirmed that there had been no lazge life loss in any <br />building (condominiums, hotels, and apartment buildings) in the United States that has <br />had fire sprinklers. Commissioner Blank noted that he had witnessed a fire in a home <br />without sprinklers and commented that the occupants were lucky to get out alive. In <br />addition, the residents were out of their homes for a long time. <br />In response to an inquiry by Commissioner Blank regazding whether a building outside <br />the five-minute response time was required to have sprinklers, Mr. Cazlson replied that <br />this is a requirement in the Municipal Code. <br />In response to an inquiry by Commissioner Pearce regarding whether the Fire <br />Department would support a Code amendment requiring fire protection systems at all <br />~, new residential construction in Pleasanton, Mr. Cazlson confirmed it would absolutely <br />support such an amendment. <br />Commissioner Blank requested that staff correct the date on the memo, which read <br />January 25, 2006. He noted that was the second time the Planning Commission <br />considered the issue, after the initial consideration in October 2005. <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED. <br />Greg Ketell, 3611 Cameron Avenue, believed the presentation was very informative and <br />stated that he put a small addition onto his property. At the time, he had approached <br />Zone 7 about installing sprinkler systems; Zone 7 stated they would replace the valve and <br />all the plumbing up to the house at no chazge because they would be able to bill him for <br />the one-inch pipe. <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. <br />Commissioner Blank expressed concern about the statement regazding City Council <br />prioritization; he would not want this item to take months or yeazs to get to City Council. <br />He was concerned about a potential conflict with the responsibilities of the Planning <br />Commission to recommend ordinances to the City Council for consideration. He <br />believed it was time to hold a public hearing, take testimony, and get it to the City <br />Council. <br />Ir <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES June 28, 2006 Page 17 of 26 <br />