PC 062806 - Laserfiche WebLink

THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED. ~. There were no speakers. THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. Commissioner Arkin moved to: (1) make the finding that the project would not have a significant effect on the environment and recommend that the City Council approve the Negative Declaration for the project; (2) make the finding that the project has a de minimus impact on the site's wildlife; (3) make the finding that the proposed rezoning and PUD development plan are consistent with the General Plan and the purposes of the PUD ordinance; (4) make the PUD findings as listed in the stafl'report; and (5) recommend that the City Council approve PUD-38, subject to the conditions of approval as listed in Exhibit B of the staff report, as recommended by staff. Commissioner Pearce seconded the motion. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Commissioners Arkin, Blank, Fox, Olson, and Pearce. NOES: None. ABSTAIN: None. . RECUSED: None. ~. ,, ABSENT: None. Resolutions Nos. PC-2006-32 and PC-2006-33, recommending approval of the Negative Declaration and the project, respectively, were entered and adopted as motioned. New Items c. Public Safety Element of the General Plan Review and provide comment on a Draft Public Safety Element of the General Plan. Ms. Stern summarized the statl'report, noting that it was a required element of the General Plan, identifying and proposing solutions to public hazards. She noted that the Commission had seen this element in July 2005 and that the draft element now addresses several comments received then. Staff had been asked to address the issue of Homeland Security, and Programs 20.3 and 21.3 had been added for that purpose. She noted that it was important for residents and employees in Pleasanton to become aware of the City's emergency plan. The element was revised to address the following concerns: 1. Policies addressing Homeland Security; 2. Actions to be taken in the event of a major emergency; PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES June 28, 2006 Page 13 of 26