Laserfiche WebLink
~ Dave Bouchard, 434 Vineyazd Place, indicated that he was in favor of the project. He <br />stated that because the center will be fairly close to where he lives, it would be a <br />convenience for him and his family, and possibly for other residents of the southeastern <br />section of Pleasanton, as he would not have to drive across town to go to Home Depot or <br />Longs Drugs. He added that he appreciates what has been done across the street with <br />the gas station and the caz wash, the convenience store and the fast food restaurants <br />because with the rising cost of gas, he does not have to drive too far to get to these places. <br />Mr. Bouchard noted that there aze very few pieces of land left in the City as it approaches <br />buildout, and from the economic viewpoint, the highest and best uses should be sought <br />for these lands. He pointed out that the amount of revenue that would be generated by <br />other uses such as a grocery store would be less that what Home Depot could bring in; <br />they would also generate a lot more traffic. Mr. Bouchard further noted that the project <br />would provide a true gateway to Pleasanton at this intersection. He added that its <br />pedestrian-friendly chazacter would provide a safe passage for school-age children <br />coming from the Vineyard Avenue area on their way to the waterslides. <br />John Corley, 699 Peters, representing the property owners, Mr. Frank Auf der Maur and <br />Mr. Konrad Rickenbach, stated that they were responsible for creating the traffic problem <br />in the area because they built Bernal Avenue from the Arroyo to Stanley Boulevard as <br />well as the railroad undercrossing which created the intersection of Valley Avenue and <br />Stanley Boulevard. He indicated that he would like the records to show that when they <br />sold the property to the synagogue, they informed the synagogue representatives that the <br />plan anticipated Nevada Court to circle through the property and end up in Utah Street to <br />/'~ serve the commercial use planned for the property. He stated that the developers for <br />Home Depot have worked closely with the synagogue and have agreed to have no access <br />to Nevada Court; however, should this project not come through and they come back in <br />the future with another developer for the site, the synagogue would not be upset if <br />Nevada Court goes through because their representatives aze awaze the street was planned <br />not as a driveway for the synagogue but to serve the other uses in the area. <br />Robert Green, 3263 Vineyazd Avenue #114, read his letter to the Commission indicating <br />his opposition to the project. He stated that the traffic in the azea has always been bad <br />even before the gas station and the fastfood restaurants were built because people were <br />using Stanley Boulevard as acut-through street to go to Livermore and Tracy. He added <br />that the addition of Home Depot and other commercial uses would create greater <br />problems and would cause traffic to back up on Santa Rita Road all the way to the <br />freeway and from Hopyazd Road to Valley Avenue. <br />Kelly Fasman, 174 Trenton Circle, indicated that she lived 1,000 feet from the proposed <br />Home Depot, which would be a destination point. She noted that while she liked and <br />shopped at Home Depot, she did not want to live next to one. She stated that this is not <br />the right location for Home Depot as the area would not be able to withstand the traffic <br />that would be generated by the store. She requested the Commission not to ruin her <br />quality of life by approving the project and urged that afull-blown Environmental Impact <br />Report (EIR) be required for a project of this magnitude. <br /> <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, May 24, 2006 Page 25 of 34 <br />