Laserfiche WebLink
(,,, Saratoga and hoped to maintain that character at this home. He did not want a sidewalk <br />on his property or in the neighborhood. Ms. Leuthauser agreed with most of the <br />neighbors' concerns, especially with respect to traffic, noise, rodent control, dust and dirt. <br />Their main concern was the sidewalk and that the opening of Mohr School had greatly <br />increased the traffic in the neighborhood. <br />Hans Wiest, 3744 Trenery Drive, noted that Ponderosa had been an excellent company to <br />deal with and had been very responsive to the neighbors' concerns. He noted that <br />Trenery Drive was a private road and that the City had turned down taking it as a public <br />road years ago. He believed the current plan made the most sense, even though all the <br />neighbors could not be pleased. He did not believe the width of the sidewalk was as <br />much of an issue as the fact that it was there in the first place. He suggested that a <br />sidewalk sufficient for safety use be built without being imposing. <br />Edwazd Reedy, 2101 Palmer Drive, described his experience with his lot and had been <br />concerned about Ponderosa's plans since the beginning. His back door is 17 feet from <br />the new fence line; he currently has a 20-acre view from his back yard. Ponderosa had <br />negotiated moving the fence back by ten feet, to which he agreed. He believed the <br />children needed some kind of passage for their safety. <br />Pam Jetter, 3618 Cameron Avenue, agreed with making the street curvilinear, such as <br />suggested by Kelly Cousins, and would like to see the traffic speed reduced. <br />("` Mazk Lauer, 3618 Trenery Drive, noted that he had grown up in this azea and would <br />prefer that it stayed as an open space, although he realized that was not reasonable. He <br />believed that the Ponderosa project was a good one and that the U-shaped street plan was <br />the best choice. He would prefer lower density but believed the current number of homes <br />was reasonable. He would prefer that the Mohr School traffic go to the front of the <br />school as was originally designed. <br />Gazy Schwaegerle, 3710 Trenery Drive, inquired about the amount of street parking for <br />this project. Chairperson Arkin noted that was not yet determined. Mr. Schwaegerle <br />supported the sidewalk concept and would like the impacts on the two neighbors <br />mitigated. He noted that he has not received any notices for these meetings and would <br />like to be noticed. <br />Robert Fulton, 1375 Briones Court, agreed that traffic could be calmed but implored the <br />Commission not to use the round circles that were on Kamp Drive. He noted that their <br />bioswales were not particularly successful right now and would not like that to be <br />included in this project. He liked the project and noted that he lived in a Ponderosa <br />home. <br />Commissioner Fox inquired whether a sidewalk could be placed near the corner of <br />Cameron Avenue and Maztin Avenue without seizing any land from the adjoining <br />neighbors, Mr. Ketell and Mr. Leuthauser. Ms. Hazdy replied that was one design <br />solution Ponderosa presented to the neighbors which may also calm the traffic. In <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES March 29, 2006 Page 20 of 25 <br />