PC 022206 - Laserfiche WebLink

~ Commissioner Fox requested that the first sentence of the second full paragraph on page 9 be modified to read as follows: "...conformance of this project with the Downtown Specific Plan and the Downtown Design Guidelines, Ms. Decker advised...." Commissioner Fox requested that the tenth sentence of the first full pazagraph on page 13 be modified to read as follows: "She believed that ~ the family restroom should be located on the ground floor rather than on the upper level." Commissioner Roberts advised that the first sentence of the second full paragraph on page 13 should be modified to read as follows: "Commissioner Roberts said that she was extremely excited about the center and noted that her adult children, •-'°° ~°` °~°°~~ °-`° °°°"°'''° •°''"° "-°° •°°-° °-°•°~~° °~ who had all attended PUSD schools, had recognized a paucity as well as a lack of emphasis on civic arts." Commissioner Roberts advised that the first sentence of the 7s' pazagraph on page 15 should be modified to read as follows: "...implementation, innovation, and approach to balance and pFeset~e preservation of the vineyards for the South Livermore Valley Plan." Chairperson Arkin believed that the language of the third pazagraph on page 6 regazding advance notification to the Jones of the Final Map hearing should have been part of the motion. Ms. Decker concurred with Chairperson Arkin's recollection. Ms. Decker noted that the third and fourth sentences of the third pazagraph on page 10 r'' should be modified to read as follows: "Tke-eAI3~ Two members of the PDA t sat on the Task Forceivas: its president, Judy Wheeler Ditter, and its treasurer, Janet Yarborough. Christine Salidivaz, who was instrumental in the writing of this letter,.- ~was very supportive of moving ahead...." Commissioner Fox noted that Ms. Salidivar had written the letter regarding the project but did not attend as a Task Force member. The minutes were approved as corrected. 3. MEETING OPEN FOR ANY MEMBER OF THE AUDIENCE TO ADDRESS THE PLANNING COMMISSION ON ANY ITEM WHICH IS NOT ALREADY ON THE AGENDA. There were none. 4. REVISIONS AND OMISSIONS TO THE AGENDA Ms. Decker advised that Item 8.c.. PRZ-13, City of Pleasanton, would be continued to the meeting of March 8, 2006. She noted that there would be adequate time to consider that item, which was tentatively scheduled to go to the City Council on Apri14, 2006. (~ PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES February 22, 2006 Page 2 of 21