PC 020806 - Laserfiche WebLink

~-. 1. Find that there are no new or changed circumstances that require additional CEQA review of the project; 2. Make the Tentative Tract Map findings regarding the acceptability or suitability of the project as described in Findings 1-9 in the staff report; and 3. Approve Tentative Tract Map 7534. Ms. Decker advised that revised conditions of approval were distributed to the Commission in two forms: the draft conditions of approval and a redlined memo of the changed conditions. Staff met with Mr. Jansen, the applicant, and he was amenable to the changes. In response to an inquiry by Commissioner Roberts regarding when the front lot was changed to two rentals by the Council, Ms. Decker replied that the inclusion of the paragraph was an error and should be deleted. In response to an inquiry by Commissioner Roberts regazding the Tentative Tract Map findings on page 5, Ms. Decker confirmed that was a new entry. In response to an inquiry by Commissioner Fox regarding whether the sidewalk on Street A would be flush with the street or whether there would be a buffer, Ms. Decker confirmed that it would be a sepazated sidewalk with a parkway on the north side and vegetated Swale on the south side between the curb and the sidewalk. !'~ In response to Commissioner Fox's inquiry regazding the maintenance of the sidewalk, if that sidewalk were located outside the right-of--way, Mr. Roush confirmed that the sidewalk would be maintained by the homeowners association and added that the property owner would enter into a maintenance agreement with the City prior to the recording of the Final Map. In response to an inquiry by Chairperson Arkin regarding whether Zone 7 and the arroyo slope had been discussed at the public hearing for the PUD and whether the homeowners association would be responsible for the maintenance of the arroyo, Ms. Decker confirmed that it was discussed at both the Planning Commission and City Council heazings. Staff clazified that in regazd to Zone 7 and the actual responsibilitiestbat were anticipated for the maintenance of the arroyo, it was unknown if those responsibilities would be accepted by Zone 7 or by the homeowners association. The City and the applicant have been in continued discussions with Zone 7, determining that the development standards for Zone 7 require a 2.5:1 slope. The City has asked the applicant to provide an open offer of dedication to Zone 7 in support of Zone 7's mission statement, and if ownership were accepted, maintenance would likely be a part of the dedication. If Zone 7 chooses not to take ownership, the homeowners association would own the lands and maintain them, similar to the Nolan Farms project. THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES February 8, 2006 Page 3 of 18