Laserfiche WebLink
Commissioner Maas would like to see all the information and would be open to this <br />application. <br />Commissioner Pearce would like to see all the information as well and did not understand <br />the need for another Home Depot in the City. She had major concerns about the traffic in <br />the area, particularly aweekend-based business. She had concerns about the safety of the <br />children at the synagogue, which also had intensive weekend use. <br />Commissioner Maas believed the applicant had worked with the synagogue to mitigate <br />the traffic problems with the cul-de-sac. <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS RE-OPENED. <br />Mr. Knoedler noted that the loop road was an alternative to help the discussion of <br />alleviating traffic at the intersection. The initial data showed the Level of Service going <br />from F to D. They preferred to have the cul-de-sac and were seeking direction on how <br />the Commission would like it to look. <br />Pamela Ott, Economic Development Manager, noted that as a general rule, it was not the <br />City's perspective to tell businesses when they need a first, second, or subsequent <br />location. The business generally approaches the City with their interests and plans. <br />~-- In response to an inquiry by Commissioner Fox regazding whether she was awaze of any <br />~ Home Depots that were not close to a freeway, Ms. Ott replied that she did not have that <br />information at her disposal. <br />Commissioner Roberts noted that she had looked for a Lowe's store that was not near a <br />freeway, but was located on East Avenue. <br />Ms. Ott advised that it was Home Depot's prerogative to choose the location of its stores, <br />and it was the community's prerogative to decide whether that worked for them. <br />THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. <br />Ms. Decker recalled that the applicant's testimony indicated that Home Depot did <br />quarterly economic analyses per store and suggested that they provide a spreadsheet or <br />analysis to answer the questions posed by the Commission regarding economic viability. <br />Commissioner Roberts did not believe this would draw customers from out of town, <br />except for west Livermore; she believed this was for the residents of the south side of <br />town. She believed that traffic was a problem, and the applicant would probably have to <br />perform an EIR. She noted that this was a commercial site with a 230KV line under it, <br />which would be highly inappropriate for housing. She liked the whole proposal and <br />believed this would be a nice entrance to the City. She added that the Home Depot may <br />need to be moved closer to Stanley Boulevard and believed the architecture should be <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES January 11, 2006 Page 16 of 19 <br />