Laserfiche WebLink
City of Pleasanton <br /> <br /> RTAFF <br /> EPORT <br /> <br /> Finance Department <br /> June 20, 1989 <br /> <br />SUBJECT: Resolution Approving the 1989-90 Operating <br /> Budget for the City of Pleasanton. <br /> <br />STAFF RECOMMENDATION: <br /> <br /> 1. Staff recommends that the City Council <br /> adopt the 1989-90 Operating Budget per <br /> the printed budget, less $10,000 relating <br /> to Redevelopment costs no longer <br /> necessary. <br /> <br /> 2. Staff recommends that the City Council <br /> give further consideration to the <br /> additional items outlined in this Staff <br /> Report and take appropriate action. <br /> <br />Honorable Mayor and Members of the Council: <br /> <br />BACKGROUND <br /> <br />The City Council reviewed the proposed 1989-90 Operating Budget <br />at a public study session on June 13, 1989. It was determined <br />that $10,000 proposed for set-up costs for Redevelopment should <br />be deleted from the Planning Department budget because of the <br />defeat of Measure C. It was also determined that further <br />consideration should be given to requests from the Tri-Valley <br />Community Television Corporation, the Amador Valley Historical <br />Society, and the Alameda County Library. A summary of these <br />requests is attached. Lastly, it was suggested that further <br />consideration be given to adding more personnel resources to the <br />Code Enforcement Program. <br /> <br />If the levels of support indicated below were given to the three <br />agencies requesting additional funds, the following would be the <br />status of the General Fund: <br /> <br />SR:89:286 1 <br /> <br /> <br />