My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
24
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2007
>
071707
>
24
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/11/2007 3:09:52 PM
Creation date
7/11/2007 3:09:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
7/17/2007
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
24
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
coverage in the two-county area to all member agencies. As a result, it represents an <br />improvement over most existing radio systems that offer only limited or no, <br />communication outside of individual city or district boundaries. Public safety agencies <br />across the country have pursued interoperability as a means of improving public safety <br />responses and services during both normal and emergency operations. <br />To achieve this goal, the ICTAP has determined that the most cost effective and <br />technically superior solution is for both counties to construct a shared two county <br />regional communications system. In order to develop this system, a task force of public <br />safety representatives from both counties recommended the formation of a joint powers <br />authority (JPA) with a board of directors with representation from both counties that will <br />oversee the financial, technical, and operations of the two county communications <br />system. <br />In response to this analysis and recommendations, both county Board of Supervisors <br />recently approved formation of the EBRCS-JPA which will be the legal entity responsible <br />for the system. It will be governed by a Board of Directors consisting of 23 directors <br />selected from participating county and city agencies. (See page 6 of Attachment A for <br />Board Membership.) The EBRCS-JPS will have authority to issue debt for system <br />acquisition and maintenance and to make decisions regarding communication <br />specifications. As a result of this action, the counties are now seeking membership from <br />interested cities and agencies. To date, most cities/agencies in Alameda and Contra <br />Costa counties have joined the JPA and others are currently in the process of agendizing <br />the matter. However, indications are that Oakland and BART may not elect to be <br />members at this time. A copy of the EBRCS-JPA agreement is attached (Attachment A). <br />While it may be possible to fund a significant portion of the physical backbone of this <br />system with federal and state grants, (decisions are expected in the next few months) it <br />will also require ongoing financial contributions from member agencies to acquire, <br />maintain and replace system components. This responsibility will continue for the life of <br />the EBRCS. The amount of financial assistance required for the EBRCS-JPA will be <br />determined in 8-12 months as part of a financial and technical plan. The final cost to <br />member agencies will be dependent upon the amount of available grant funding, the total <br />project cost including the cost of debt service anticipated to acquire the system, and the <br />number of participating cities/agencies. While Pleasanton's cost will not be determined <br />until completion of the financial plan, it is expected to be similar to replacing the cities' <br />radio system. During this same time frame, it is anticipated that more information will be <br />developed outlining service levels, maintenance services, system phasing and other <br />operational issues. <br />It should be noted that the Pleasanton/ Livermore system is owned jointly by the two <br />cities and operates with its own radio channels/frequencies and equipment without the <br />need of county or regional assistance. As a result, unlike many cities/agencies that <br />currently rely on the two counties for their communication services, <br />Pleasanton/Livermore system is independent and self reliant. Further, while the <br />Pleasanton/Livermore staffs support the goal of interoperability, questions remain <br />regarding whether a new city system or the EBRCS system will best meet the <br />communication needs of both cities. As a result, we are in the unique position of moving <br />Page 3 of 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.