13 ATTACHMENTS - Laserfiche WebLink

»> "Nick Kavayiotidis" <nkavas@petrainvestors.com> 3/14/2007 12:10 PM »> »> Brian, Did my engineer give you all the info you need to make a decision? I know you've been in contact. I'm planning to submit my development application to the City by the end of the week and would like to include an informal "OK" email from you regarding the site and drainage plan if possible. We can follow up with something more formal later. Thanks Nick -----Original Message----- From: Brian Wines [mailto:BWines@waterboards.ca.govJ Sent: Monday, March 05, 2007 4:39 PM To: jgan@dfg.ca.gov; nkavas@petrainvestors.com Subject: Re: updated project description: Sunol Blvd. Hi Nick The revised plans look OK to me. When can you get me plans for the stormwater treatment feature? Will water from the treatment feature be discharged to the creek on site, or to the local storm sewer system. I can't remember whether or not an outfall will be needed for the stormwater treatment. Thanks Brian » > "Nick Kavayiotidis" <nkavas@petrainvestors.com> 2/14/2007 5:31 PM »> »> Janice, It appears I might need an extension for my 1600 application. The City of Pleasanton asked me to change my alternate site plan (x-7, the one I had staked for you and Brian). The new plan moves my building further South, thereby providing internal circulation on the North end of my property (the City didn't want people to enter from the South, not find parking and then have to exit and make two "U turns" to re-enter th e property.) Don't worry.I've made sure any site plan changes do not encroach beyond the location of the stakes and, in fact, the proposed plans will better address the proximity of stake #4 to the channel in the North East corner of the site, which I had agreed in our site meeting to move to the South. I've overlapped the topo with stake locations over x-7 and manually overlapped this over x-12. x-12, the site plan which I think will be approved, is not any closer than x-7 was to the channel, and as you can see, the location of the parking lot in the North East corner of x-12 is much further South compared to x-7 and no longer intrusive to the drainage channel. While x-12 is hand drawn pending approval from the City, I made great care to trace no further than the location of the stakes as marked in "1989SITE.pdf". The architect's final version will comply with these stake locations. So, I've been waiting for a response from the City before commencing on my grading/drainage plan and landscape plan. I wanted to have a final site plan along with input from my landscape architect prior to updating my application and project description, but that doesn't appear it will happen before 2/22 or approximately 90 days after my application was received. However, if agreeable, please accept my updated project description changes below along with the attached files, or if you prefer, please extend my application another 30 days or so. Of course, if you have any suggestions to my description, or need me to fill out the 2