03/12/69 - Laserfiche WebLink

~ ~--. b. Application to the County Board of Supervisors for a quarry permit by Pacific Cement & Aggregates, a Division of Lone Star Cement Corporation, et al, and California Rock and Gravel Comoanv Mr. Castro explained to the Commissioners the permit that had been applied for. The land in question is the south side of Stanley Boulevard lying between PCA and Cal Rock. Mr. Castro demonstrated this area on a map for the Commissioners' benefit. The County is asking for a rehabilitation plan. Both companies are providing an 80 ft. setback to provide for the final widening of Stanley Boulevard. Commissioner Antonini asked if anything was said about the dirt piled up on both aides of Stanley Boulevard. Pleasanton is in no position to require any conditioning on these berme, but perhaps this application could be also subjected to the recommen- dations of both the Cities of Pleasanton and Livermore. Chairman Plato feels that the City of Pleasanton should be concerned with this item, since in 1984, the County plane to bdld a four-lane highway between Pleasanton and Livermore. Apparently the widening will begin this year east of Isabel to Livermore. The Commission felt it was necessary to adopt a resolution for the conditioning they would like to see incorporated in this application, and upon motion of Commissioner Carrigan, seconded by Commissioner Gibbs, and carried, the following resolution wan unanimously adopted. RESOLUTION N0. 875 WNEREAS, the referral from the Alameda County Planning Commission regarding the application fora sand and gravel permit for Pacific Cement 6 Aggregates and Cal Rock, at the southerly aide of Pleasanton-Livermore Road, approximately three miles east of Pleasanton off Stanley Boulevard, has been reviewed by this Commission, NOW, TNEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning Commission of the City of Pleasanton, after review and study of said application would recommend that the County attach certain condi- tions to the application ae follows: 1. That the minimum standards as noted in our Zoning Ordinance #520, Article 9, Section 9.104.Sa, be applied to this application. 2. As a further condition of approval, the Planning Commission would recommend that the 80 ft. setback which to our understanding is to encompass the future widening of Stanley Boulevard, be entirely landscaped at this time. The Commission further expressed a desire that some condition be made at this time to provide a minimum 50 ft. landscaped buffer at such time as Stanley Boulevard is improved west of Isabel to the City of Pleasanton. We make this finding known since the period of this permit as noted on the appli- cation ie for 25 years. 3. As a further condition of approval, the Planning Commission of the City of Pleasanton would request that the landscaping berm, as previously made a condition on the Cal Rock property, not be made a condition for this permit. ltie reasons for the Commission's action is that we are of the opinion that if this type of buffer along Stanley Boulevard is to continue on other quarry properties, a tunneling effect will occur. It is the Commission's desire that the landscaped area remain flat and that some adequate landscaped screening be established. - 7 -