My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
07/23/69
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1960-1969
>
1969
>
07/23/69
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/3/2017 9:42:27 AM
Creation date
7/9/2007 4:46:40 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
7/23/1969
DOCUMENT NAME
07/23/69
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
• T^ ~ <br />2. That the applicant provide elevations for <br />those sites and houses on corner lots facing <br />streets for approval by this department. <br />3. That the applicant shall submit for City's <br />approval a description of the type of fencing <br />that is to be provided along Foothill Road. <br />4. That the applicant shall provide at least one <br />street tree for each individual dwelling unit. <br />5. That the applicant shall resubmit a landscaping <br />plan for the areas to be landscaped along Foothill <br />Road. <br />6. That the applicant shall adhere to all con- <br />ditions as imposed on the tentative map. <br />7. That final zoning for this development is hereby <br />recommended from the interim Planned Unit Develop- <br />ment District to the R-1-6500. <br />c. Pleasanton Greens - Kottinser Park <br />Request from Dr. Howard Long in conjunction with the Pleasanton Housing Authority <br />for a preliminary review of the site plan and architectural review of that <br />project known as Pleasanton Greens. <br />The Planning Director emphasized that this presentation was by no means a formal <br />application before the Commission, but merely a request for opinions and sugges- <br />tions the Commission may wish to give to the group responsible for this project. <br />Vice Chairman Pons inquired why the Commissioners were being asked to review <br />these plane since this housing project had not even been formally applied for. <br />Dr. Howard Long then came forward and advised the Commission that from the meeting <br />held in March of this year between the Housing Authority and the City Council, <br />this particular project should fall under the category of a Civic project aimed <br />at families with moderate incomes. <br />The question of the park was brought before the Advisory Committee to the General <br />Plan and they approved the concept as opposed to the original plan for said park <br />in this area. <br />Dr. Long explained, with three diagrams, the exteriors of the 2-3-4 and 5-bedroom <br />townhouses. The prices will not be higher than ordinary frame construction homes. <br />There were questions raised about the cost of the homes due to the one-third use <br />of frame in addition to the module construction, which is far lower in cost. <br />The Planning Director inquired if there are any other styles besides the townhouse <br />concept. The answer was no. There will also be courtyards for each unit. <br />Dr. Long remarked that they were looking for the assistance of the Commissioners, <br />and in particular the staff, to cnt~down the cost in every way possible and <br />still produce housing that would meet with the approval of the Planning Department. <br />This could perhaps mean modifications on carports, etc. There was also the <br />thought that perhaps parking could be made more convenient for those residents <br />living closer to Vineyard and Regalia. <br />- 4 - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.