|
he knew of any objections by the residents to the proposed development. Mr. Orloff
<br />stated that Mr, Hilliker had held meetings of the residents and that he knew of no
<br />objections. Mr. Hilliker pointed out that all had been informed of this meeting.
<br />After further discussion the Commissioners decided that no public hearing need be
<br />held, and that fencing of the swimming pool should be left to the discretion of the
<br />builder. As the Planning Commission found that all conditions of Section 2,21 of
<br />the Interim Zoning Ordinance No. 276 had been met, it was moved by Commissioner
<br />Wharton, seconded by Commissioner Wetherby and passed unanimously that RESOLUTION
<br />#8 be adopted, granting the Conditional Zoning Permit to Dublin Realty Co, upon the
<br />following conditions; 1) That a six foot fence of a woven wire type be erected
<br />along the Arroyo Del Valle creek blink; 2) That the entire area be landscaped; 3)
<br />Lhal all units withu7 2001 of Division Street be only one story high; 4) That one
<br />covered garage area per unit be supplied and that additional adequare off street
<br />parking area be provided at the ratio of one extra space for each three units; 5)
<br />That all construction, paving, drainage, sidewalks, etc, meet the standards aixl spec-
<br />ifications of the City Engineer; 6) That development be according to the plans,
<br />dated August 9, 1957, entitled "Proposed Garden :lpartmerts, Pleasanton, California"
<br />as submitted by the applicant with his petition for a Conditional Zoning i'ermit.
<br />The Variance request of M.G.C. Co. was presez,ted by Mr, Cotton, representing that
<br />firm. He stated the application for variance was due to an error in the layout of
<br />the house, located on Lot 3 Block 6 of Tract 1752, The garage enroaches on the set
<br />back area a distance of three feet, hence creating a setback distance of sevc:ateen
<br />feet rather than the 20 feet as required by ordinance. After some discussion, dur-
<br />ing which ?tr. ?Iasonheimer pointed out to Mr. Cotton that some effort should be made
<br />to control these setback variations prior to the building, rather than afterwards,
<br />the Commission on motion of Commissioner Trowbridge, seconded by Commissioner Hani-
<br />fen, adopted unanimously RESOLUTION f/9 recommending to the City Council the granting
<br />of the Variance request.
<br />The application of Robertson ~ Robertson for a Conditional Zoning Pen~ut to develop
<br />a mobile home trailer park on Bernal Avenue was considered. A letter was read from
<br />the partners stating their desire for a:mexation and that their contract with the
<br />City of San Francisco is contingent upon the issuance of the permit by the City of
<br />Pleasanton. The letter asserted that they would apply for annexation upon receiving
<br />said permit. A discussion followed on the desirability of annexis~ the e:rtire 14
<br />acres outside the City Limits immediately, a procedure the Commissioners felt should
<br />be made ~ condition for granting the zoning permit, In view of the fact that public
<br />hearings had previously been held on a similiar application, subsequently withdrawn,
<br />and no serious public opposition had been voiced, it was decided tl~tit no further
<br />hearings were necessary, The Commission found that all conditions of Section 2,22
<br />of the Interim Zoning Ordinance No. 276 had been fulfilled, and Commissioner Sr'ether-
<br />by moved and Commissioner Wharton seconded, the adoption of 33SOLUTION #10, granting
<br />the Conditional Zoning permit subject to the following conditions: 1) That the
<br />approval of the zoning permit be ratified by the City Council and if there were any
<br />changes, same would be returned to the Planning Commission; 2) That the entire area
<br />outside the City Limits be annexed immediately; 3) That all standards as set forth
<br />in the proposed Mobile Home Yark Ordinance, as submitted by Harold :7i se & Associates,
<br />as amended and introduced by the Council be observed; 4} All construction, paving,
<br />drainage, etc. meet the standards and specifications of the City Engineer; 5) That
<br />suEh annual license fees as may be set by the City Council shall be collectable from
<br />the operator; 6) That site plans, as shown on drawing entitled "Plot flan for Mob-
<br />ile Home Park", dated August 13th be conformed to.
<br />The application of Mrs. Vallarino, 248 Vineyard, was studied, however due to the
<br />absence of Mrs. Vallarino or any representative to explain her proposed building,
<br />further consideration was postposed until the next meeting of August 29th.
<br />The planning consultant presented suggested general land use districts for the Com-
<br />mission s consideration. He stated that such zones would be used only as a guide
<br />for evaluating application for Conditional Zoning Permits under the Interim Zoning
<br />Ordinance, Mr, Rugg explained the "cluster* plan for the central business district,
<br />pointing out that this type of development was best iu view of the fact that it had
<br />its start in existing structures, The suggested areas for Central Commercial Thor
<br />oughfare Commercial and Industrial districts were pointed out. Residential areas
<br />
|