My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
11/22/57
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1950-1959
>
1957
>
11/22/57
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/17/2013 12:37:14 PM
Creation date
7/9/2007 2:46:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
11/22/1957
DOCUMENT NAME
11/22/57
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
permit. Ln view of this Comriaaioner Wharton suggested the permit be granted <br />for aiz months with an option for renewal, provided that the Commission could <br />hold a pnblic hearing if caa~laints warrant it and, if conditions justify, <br />could refuse to renew the permit beyond the first six months. <br />Resolution No. 16 <br />Introduced by Commissioner Wotherby, seconded by Cosmdasioner Wharton, <br />finding that the conditions of the Interim Zoning Ordinance are met; granting <br />the Conditional Zoning Permit for a period of aiz (6) months with an automatic <br />renewal for an additional aiz (6) nwnths.unless complaints are receired, in which <br />case the six (6) months extension may be reviewed by the Commission, a public <br />hearing held and the permit revoked if xarranted; and adopted by the following <br />vote: <br />AYES: Comrisaionera DeVor, Hanifen, Mitchell, Trowbridge, Wharton and <br />Wetherby. <br />NOBS: None. <br />ABSENT: Nons. <br />Application of Roy N. Jansen, 1313 East Avenue, Livermore, for a Conditional <br />Zoning Permit for the business-commercial use of a parcel of land near the Alisal <br />School and described in Ordinance No. 267. <br />The City Attorney explained that the Interim Zoning Ordinance had in effect <br />set aside previous district zoning action, leaving some doubt as to the proper <br />procedure to obtain an extension of the tine limits set out in Ordinance No. 267. <br />Thin provision requires construction to be started on the professional buildings <br />proposed by Mr. Jensen within one year, or prior to December 10, 1957. Mr. <br />Struthers expressed the opinion that action by the Commission under theInterim <br />Zoning Ordinance would be appropriate. <br />Mr. Jensen stated that due to general building conditona, it is not practical <br />to start construction at this time, bnt he wishes to have continued the comercial- <br />buainess use for an additional year. <br />Commissioner Wetherby stated this matter seemed to be one of required routine <br />since the zoning. question has long since been decided. He noted that Ordinance <br />No. 26? was reatrictire in other ways than just time - namely that it be used for <br />professional offices, requires off-street parking, be screened, etc. <br />Upon being asked Mr. Jensen said the property in question is one and one half <br />acres in size and is not a portion of Tract 1825, but lien between the tract a~ <br />the Aliaal School on the east aide of Santa Rita. <br />Resolution No. 17 <br />Introduced by Commissioner Wetherby and seconded by Commissioner Hanifen, <br />firming that the application meets the requirements of the Interim Zoning Ordinance <br />and granting the Conditional Zoning Permit fora period of one year, oa•eondition <br />that all the requj.roments (except that of time limit) of Ordinance No. 267 (a copy <br />of which is attached hereto) be complied with, and adopted by the following vote: <br />AYES: Commissioners DeVor, Hanifen, Mitchell, Trowbridge, Wharton sad <br />Wetherby. <br />NOTES: None. <br />Application of Raymond L. Borame, Temple Street, Sunol, to build a multiple <br />family unit oa the rear of the two lots commonly known as 340 and 350 Augustine <br />Street, was presented. <br />Mr. Borame explained that he had taken an option on the property which has <br />110 feet of frontage and over 168 feet in depth. Two small single family units <br />are on the front of the lots with 22 feet betweett them. He wishes to build a <br />duplez (total eight rooms) 30 by 60 feet on the rear portion of the lots, which <br />has a total building site area of almost 18,000 square feet. He pointed out that <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.