Laserfiche WebLink
IN THX PLANPIIVG COAIFIISBION OF T_HP CITY OF YLEASANTON <br />COUNTY OF <1LAh1EDA, STe1TE OF CALIFORNIA <br />Minutes <br />March 5, 1959 <br />The meeting of the ileasanton Planning Commission was called to order at City Hall <br />on March 5, 1959, at 8:o~clock, Chairman 1:'etherby presiding. <br />Roll Call: Present - Coam~issioners Allison, b;harton, Lozano, Aiitchell and Hanifen <br />Absent - Corrnnissioner De Vor <br />On motion of Commissioner Hanifen, seconded by Commissiom~r Lozano the minutes of the <br />meeting of February 5, 1959 were ap;•--roved as submitted. <br />Afr. John Jaacke was present to request a Conditional Zoning Permit allowing him to <br />build a one bedroom cottage in the rear of an existing house on his property at 118 <br />Spring Stre^t. On motion of Commissioner Hanifen, seconded by Commissioner !~lharton, <br />Resolution No. 53 was adopted by the following vote: Commissioners Allison, Lozano, <br />!4harton, Hanifen and `:;'etherby, Noes: Commissioner A?itchell, The Resolution reads as <br />follows: 1) no public hearing is deemed necessary in the public interest; 2) that <br />the applicable sections of Ordinance 293 are met; 3) the b.iilder must conform to the <br />side yard requirements and building cede; 4) that the shed now used for storage be <br />removed; 5) that the Conditional Zoning Permit is hereby granted. <br />Atr. Roy Jensenrs request for Conditional Zoning Permit on the commercial property on <br />Santa Rita Rd, was presented.. Following som discussion relative to the zoning of this <br />property under the proposed Gen,ra.l Plan a motion was made by Commissioner 1~,`harton, <br />seconded by Commissioner Lozano and approved by all present mrantin~ the Conditional <br />Zoning Permit. Resolution No. 54 reads as follows: 1) no public hearing is deemed nec- <br />essary in the public interest; 2) cmiditi.ons of the applicable sections of Ordinance <br />293 are met; 3) the permit is hereby granted fora ?eriod of six months subject to the <br />following concii.tions: <br />1) The property may be employed solely in the following uses: <br />a) ddministrative and executive offices <br />b) Professional offices and medical clinics <br />c) Off-street parking lots required to service pernutted uses <br />d) Accessory buildings and appurtenant to permitted uses <br />e) One sign appurtenant to permitted uses, no sign to exceed 2 sq. ft. in area. <br />2) Structures shall be essentially residential in character and shall harmonize with <br />the architecture of existing structures and adjacent to them, <br />3) No structure shall be in excess of one story or 15 feet in height. <br />4) Off-street parking space for each two hundred square feet of office floor space <br />plus one parking space for each employee or staff member shall be provided. <br />5) Maximum lot coverage shall be 25 a. <br />6) A permanently landscaped strip no less than 10 feet wide abutting residential <br />property lines and no less than 20 feet wide a'uu*.tine all public streets shall be <br />maintained. <br />7) Curb breaks given access to the property shall not occur closer than ~0 feet <br />from the nearest curb of an intersection street. Curb breala shall be no wider than <br />20 feet and shall be separated from the adjacent breaks by a curb no less than 30 <br />feet in length. <br />8) A clearly legible site plan with all dimensions drawn to scale and architectural <br />drawings including a perspective dra:ring of all b~.iildings to be erected shall be sub- <br />mitted to the Co:mission for a uroval prior to corvnencement of construction activity. <br />9) One directory sign to be placed en the premises, not to exceed 144 square inches <br />in size for each office. <br />4) a copy of this resolution shall be forwarded tc the Oity Council. <br />City Administrator Christen stated that a meeting would be ?field t!:e following day on <br />the Industrial Park to be located in Pleasanton, <br />A work session for Thursday, ~1arch 26th was set to discuss the proposed Sub-Division <br />Ordinance. <br />A?r, Landon, a citizen, questioned the use of the proposed se~.aer tax to finance the Ind- <br />ustrial Park. The City Administrator explained that the money could only be used for <br />Sewer Capital improvements, <br />As there way no further business to come before the corunissi_on the meeting was adjourn- <br />ed at 9:30 I'.`.i. to `farchl9, 1959 at 9 1'.M. <br />