08/04/60 - Laserfiche WebLink

IN THE PIANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PLEASANTON COUNTY OF AIAMEDA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA Minutes August 4, 1960 The regularly scheduled meeting of the Pleasanton Planning Commission was called to order at the City Hall on August 4, 1960 at 8:05 P.M. with Chairman Ralph Mitchell presiding. ROLL CALL: present - Commissioners Landon and LOZariO Absent -Commissioners Allison and Hanifen The minutes of July 21, 1960 were corrected to read, " 30' minimum paved street allowing limited parking within the existing and proposed 40' right of way improved to City Standards. This Street to be stubbed off at the northwesterly boundary of Tract 2217. On motion of Commissioner Landon, seconded by Commissioner Lozano, and approved by all Commissioners present the minutes of July 21, 1960 were approved as corrected. Public Hearing was then held on the application of John J. Amaral for a 4' Variance from sideyard requirements, to construct a garage at 261 Spring Street. Discussion. Public Hearing closed. On Motion of Commissioner Landon, seconded by Commissioner Lozano, and approved by all Commissioners present RESOLUTION 113 was granted. RESOLUTION ll3 Whereas, the application of John J. Amaral for a 4' Variance to sideyard require- ments under Ordinance X309 (Zoning Ordinance) as amended, having come before this Commission August ~+, 1960, the Planning Commission does hereby Resolve as follows: 1. The Planning Commission does find as follows: a) Notice has been given as required by law. b) The circumstances required by section 19.1003 of said Ordinance X309 do exist. 2. A 2' Variance is hereby granted. 3. A copy of this Resolution shall be sent to interested parties. Public Hearing was then held on the application of Ralph Pahlmeyer for an Amendment to the Zoning Ordinance in District Boundaries from R2 to CT for lots 4, 5, and 6 ( 4568 - 4584 ) First Street. Ned Robinson and others spoke in behalf of the applicant and presented a petition, which was filed with the clerk. Herman Kolln and other property owners of the neighborhood protested the application, and filed a petition against the rezoning. Public Hearing was closed. On motion of Commissioner Landon, seconded by Commissioner Mitchell, the Planning Commission adopted RESOLUTION 114 recommending to the City Council that the application be denied, on the following vote: Ayes: Commissioners Tendon and Mitchell Noes: Commissioner Lozano Absent: Commissioners Allison and Hanifen RESOIA7TION 114 Whereas, Public Hearing was duly held after notice required by law, and good cause appearing, The Planning Commission does hereby Resolve as follows: 1. The Planning Commission does hereby recosmnend to the City Council that the Application of Ralph Pahlmeyer for Rezoning be denied.