02/16/61 - Laserfiche WebLink

2. The Planning Commission believes that the City of Livermore~s choice of site has been influenced by the apparent ease of acquiring land from Alameda County, and that this has influenced the City of Livermore's position in its choice. 3. This Planning Commission does recommend that the City of Livermore study the feasibiAity of extending its present Airport in a Westerly direction. 4. A copy of this Resolution shall be sent to interested parties. Consideration of the request for Annexation by John M. Stanley was brought before the Commission. Several property owners from Adams Court were present, and stated their views on the Annexation. Mr. Stanley answered questions and summarized his interests. Mr. J. Perry and Mr. Wm. Hall spoke in behalf of the Annexation. On motion of Commissioner Allison, seconded by Commissioner Landon, and ap- proved by all Commissioners present, Resolution #133 was adopted. RESOLUTION #133 Resolved: 1. The Planning Commission of the City of Pleasanton, having heard the views of neighbors and resddents of Adams Court and Vineyard Avenue, does here- by recommend favorably to the City Council the propost~ "Annexation #16;, Vineyard Avenue South, Stanley Annex. 2. The Planning Commission recommends that upon Annexation, the holding zone for 180 days be fixed as d'ollows: RG - 25 (Residential-Garden-2500) 3. The Planning Commission recommends that Por General Plan purposes, the remaining area on Vineyard Avenue South, Easterly of the City limits be R-1, Single Family Residential. 4. A copy of this Resolution shall be sent to interested parties. Mr. S. Corbett, of Nuclear Engineering, summarized the proposal to expand the present Radio Active Wastes Disposal facility at 65 Ray Street. The Expansion would include additional storage of radio active wastes. Mr. Corbett stated tie noise and dust would be minimized with absolute filtration. All the work would be done inside, and there would be no effluent. The Planning Commission asked several questions of Mr. Corbett. Dr. Beatty and others in the audience offered comments. The report of Joint City - Chamber of Commerce Off-Street Parking Committee was tabled until the next meeting. There being no further business to come before the Commission, on Motion of Commissioner Lozano, seconded by Commissioner Landon, and approved by all Commissioners present, the meeting was adjourned at 11:20 p. m. to meet again on March 2, 1961, at 8:00 p. m. at the City Hall. )) J / / CC S James M. Fales, r. - Se etary