|
some extremely strict conditions attached to the Conditional Uae Permit. Cosffiaeion-
<br />er Rega suggested a continuation of the matter so the Commission might study it
<br />further. It was agreed that a field trip by the Commission would be made to the
<br />trailer park site on Wednesday, August 21, at 6:30 P.M, It was moved by Commissioner
<br />Rega, seconded by Commissioner Wipfli, and carried, that the Variance application of
<br />Mr. Ted Kuhlkin be continued to the meeting of August 28, 1963.
<br />The next item oa the agenda was the Report of the Subdivision Committee re: Applica-
<br />tion of MacKay & Sompe, Civil Engineers, for approval of a minor subdivision on
<br />Vineyard Avenue. Mr. Fa1ea read the minutes of the Subdivision Committee meeting of
<br />August 6, b963. Mr. Ted Fairfield, representing MacKay & Sompa, was present in the
<br />audience, and expressed the opinion that the method of enforcement appeared to be
<br />rather harsh. He requested the minor subdivision be approved subject to a guarantee
<br />by bond rather than entering into a contract, and therefore requested rewording of
<br />Condition No. 2 as stated in the Subdivision Committee minutes. Mr, Falea suggested
<br />setting down a condition of approval of the minor subdivision which would grant to
<br />the Chief Building Official the power to withhold the building permit on either of
<br />the pieces being subdivided until the necessary street improvements have been in-
<br />stalled or a bond established, City Engineer Campbell stated that at the time the
<br />building permit is ieaued the applicant should have street improvements constructed
<br />or guarantee them. Upon motion of Commissioner Antonini, seconded by Commissioner
<br />Rega, the following resolution was unanimously adopted by those Commissioners present?
<br />RESOLUTIOI7 I10. 237
<br />WHEREAS, MacKay & Sompa, Civil Engineers, has submitted an application for
<br />Minor Subdivision No. 63-2, and said application having been duly
<br />considered by the Subdivision Committee and the Planning Commission;
<br />NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVID AS FOLLOi•7S:
<br />1. The map entitled, "Record of Survey of a Portion of Plot b
<br />and Plot 7, as Shown on Map of 'Pleasanton Homesteads', filed
<br />in Book b of Mapa at Pg. 30, Alameda County Records", is
<br />hereby approved subject to the following conditions:
<br />a. The property owner grant to the City an 8-ft. wide
<br />public aervlce easement along Vineyard Avenue for the
<br />full frontage of the property to be subdivided.
<br />b. No building permit be ieaued regarding development of the
<br />subject property without either all necessary street
<br />improvements having been installed to City standards as
<br />specified by the City Engineer or other appropriate arm
<br />rangementa made to the satisfaction of the City which
<br />will insure installation of necessary improvements at an
<br />appropriate time.
<br />Under Matters for the Information of the Commission, Secretary Fales brought up the
<br />matter of the appeal to the City Council by A,H, Johnson and I•].A. Eaton from a Plan-
<br />ning Commission decision denying application for an amendment to Ord, No. 309 re-
<br />zoning a parcel of approximately one acre located on the swrtheast corner of Santa
<br />Rita Road and Nevis Street, from Rrl to RG-15. The City Council held a public hear-
<br />ing on the appeal on August 12, and referred the matter banck to the Coa®ission under
<br />Section 22.110 of the Zoning Ordinance with a statement of Council intenC to approve
<br />the application as RC-25 instead of RG-15, There is no need for the Commission to
<br />hold a further public hearing on the matter. It c~as moved by Commissioner Antonini,
<br />seconded by Commissioner Wipfli, and carried, that the Council referral on the above
<br />matter be scheduJ.ed for the Planning Commission meeting of August 28, 1963.
<br />Secretary Fales then presented to the Commission another matY.er which was brought
<br />before the City Council, namely, that through the efforts of the Induatri.al Commit-
<br />tee of the Chamber of Commerce an3 Mr. C, Covey of Sacramento Concrete Pipe Co.,
<br />the Sacramento Concrete Pipe Co, is considering purchasing property currently owned
<br />by Kaiser Sand and Gra~~el Division located west of its existing gravel plant, north
<br />of Stanley Boulevard and east of Pioneer Village. The Sacramento Concrete Pipe Co,
<br />wishes to purchase from five to twenty acres immediately adjacent to the railroad
<br />on Raiser Sand and Gravel property, if agreeable to the owners and the City, in c,rde::
<br />to install a concrete pipe manufacturing plant. Pfr. Covey has told the Industrial
<br />Committee and City Council that this trould be an advantageous location in order to
<br />
|