12/11/63 - Laserfiche WebLink

4. A grading, drainage, driveway and parking plan moat be submitted with the application for building permit. 5. The structures moat be joined, or separated by a 30-foot separation. 6. Existing tree at north end of property moat either be saved or replaced with a suitable substitute. 7. Architectural character moat be the same ae in the existing six unite. The next item on the agenda was Consideration of Proposed Mobile Home Park Land Use; Annexation No. 33, Vineyard Avenue Annex "A". Mr. A.G. Overpack, developer of the subject property, was present in the audience, as was Mr. Ted Fairfield. Mr, Falea atatefl the property is scheduled for public protest hearing by the City Council for annexation on January 13, 1964. The matter is before the Planning Commission at this time for consideration and recommendation to the City Council. The staff recom- mends this proposal be considered as a Planned Unit Development and as a subdivision, particularly with regard to submission of improvement plane. Mr. Falea read from Sections 17.403 and 17.404, Ordinance No. 309, regarding mobile home parks, and stated the subject proposal meets the requirements as set forth therein. City Engineer Campbell read two paragraphs from California State Codes governing mobile home parks, and stated that State laws primarily are related to safety with regard to gee, electricity and water, lot layout, drainage and grading. Following con- siderable discussion, upon motion of Chairman Landon, seconded by Commissioner Rega, the following resolution was adopted by unanimous vote of those Commissioners present: RESOLUTION N0. 260 RESOLVED: Consideration having been given by the City Planning Commission of Proposed Mobile Home Park Land Uae; Annexation No. 33, Vineyard Avenue Annex "A", a parcel of approximately 30 acres located on the north aide of Vineyard Avenue, the following recommendations are made to the City Council: 1. The City should proceed to complete the proposed annexation. 2. Upon annexation, the subject property should be zoned C-T, Commercial Thoroughfare, with the specific provision that the Owner will apply for Planned Unit Development Approval for a mobile home park. 3. The requirements of Ordinance No. 309, the Zoning Ordinance, regarding mobile home parks should be met by the Owner. 4. The Owner should submit tentative and final improvement plane for the subject development, similar to those re- quired by Ordinance No. 358, the Subdivision Ordinance. 5. In addition, prior to final approval of the subject develop- ment, the Owner should submit a complete set of plena approved by tEae State of California, ae required by Division 13, Part 2, Health and Safety Code; and Title 8, Chapter 9, Administrative Code. 6, Upon development of the subject mobile home park, the City should acquire a recreation easement through that portion of the subject property which lies within the banks of the Arroyo del Valle, and should require that this area be dedicated to the Alameda County Flood Control and Water Conservation District for flood control purposes. There being no further business to come before the Commission, upon motion of Com- mieaioner Lozano, eeconded by Commissioner Rega, the meeting was adjourned at 9:47 P.M., to meet again on Wednesday,