|
N.iNUT ES
<br />of
<br />THE MEETING
<br />of
<br />THE PLANNING COr4IISSION
<br />Pleasanton, California
<br />atach 25, 1964
<br />The regularly scheduled meeting of the Planning Commission was called to order at
<br />8:00 P.M. on Wednesday, March 25, 1964, by Chairman Philip Landon.
<br />ROLL CALL showed the following:
<br />Present: Commissioners Lozano
<br />Rega
<br />Chairman Landon
<br />Secretary False
<br />Absent: Commissioners Antonini
<br />Wipfli
<br />On motion of Commissioner Lozano, seconded by Commissioner Rega, the minutes of the
<br />meeting of March 11, 1964, were approved ae presented by unaniawua vote of those
<br />Commissioners present.
<br />Chairmen Landon opened the public hearing on the application of R.A. Martin, 1091
<br />Enderby Way, Sunnyvale, for annexation to the City of Pleasanton of a parcel con-
<br />taining approximately 20 acres, located southeasterly of the intersection of
<br />Pleasanton-Sunol Road and Sycamore Avenue, with a request for single-family reai-
<br />dential zoning classification upon annexation. Mr. Ted Fairfield, of MacKay and
<br />Sompe, requested that the audience be given the benefit of the staff report before
<br />the public hearing, whereupon Chairman Landon asked Mr. Fales to give the staff
<br />report. Since the matter had been referred to Livingston and Blayney, City and
<br />Regional Planners, Mr. Fales read their report of March.20, 1964, in which they
<br />recommended R-1 zoning, single-family residential district, with lot sizes ranging
<br />from 6,500 to 10,000 eq.ft., ae proposed by the applicant. However, since the sub-
<br />ject property is but a smell part of a larger area, and because land use and inter-
<br />nal traffic circulation will be important considerations, Livingston and Blayney
<br />recommended that subdivision plane for the property not be approved until a achem-
<br />atic plan for future development of the entire area has been prepared and approved
<br />by the City.. Upon resumption of the public hearing, Mr. Fairfield spoke in favor
<br />of the proposal, stating he was in accord with the Livingston and Blayney report,
<br />and presented a preliminary sketch of possible lot layouts. Speaking in opposition
<br />to the proposal, and recommending one-acre minimum lots, were residents of the area:
<br />Mr. and Mra. G.E. Dailey, Mr. and Mre. Andrew Holm, Mr. Harold Fellows, Mr. Larry
<br />Lambert and Mr. Gene Dana who presented a letter from the Petition Committee of the
<br />Alieal Improvement Club and a petition containing 93 signatures requesting the
<br />present Alameda County REB-4 zoning be maintained and extended. Mr. Fales explained
<br />that the applicant ie requesting that jurisdiction be changed from Alameda County
<br />by annexation to the City of Pleasanton, and also that there is a distinction be-
<br />tween urban-oriented and rural-oriented development; the City's Planning Conault-
<br />ante indicate the area in question will be more urban-oriented. It was moved by
<br />Commissioner Lozano, seconded by Commissioner Rega, and carried, that the public
<br />hearing be closed. After considerable discussion by the Commission, upon motion
<br />of Commissioner Rega, seconded by Commissioner Lozano, the following resolution was
<br />adopted by unanimous vote of those Commissioners present:
<br />RESOLUTION N0. 282
<br />WHEREAS, the application of R.A. Martin, 1091 Enderby Wey, Sunnyvale, for
<br />annexation l-o the City of Pleasanton of a parcel containing ap-
<br />proximately 20 acres, located southeasterly of the intersection of Pleaeanton-
<br />Sunol Road and Sycamore Avenue; with a request for single-family residential
<br />zoning classification upon annexation, tiae come before this Co®f.eaion;
<br />NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
<br />The City Planning Commission does hereby recommend favorably
<br />to the City Council annexation to the City of Pleasanton
<br />of the above-named property ae Annexation No. 35, Pleaeanton-
<br />Sunol Annex "D".
<br />
|