Laserfiche WebLink
WHEREAS, this Commi.aeion does find that: <br />1. Notice has been given as required by Section 22.104 <br />of Ordinance No. 309; <br />2. The proposed amendment conforms with the Pleasanton <br />General Plan; and <br />3; The public necessity and general welfare requires the <br />proposed change of district; <br />NOW, THEgEFORE, BE IT <br />RESOLVED, that the Pla}~ning Commiasiolicationeforyrezoningnofftheasubject <br />by the City Council the app <br />property as described above. <br />Chairman Landotf then opened the public hearing on the application of D & V <br />Builderb, Inc:i 6000 TeloraYaPt ect•aign on property locatedonorthwesterly ofdthe <br />order tb install s temp y <br />intersection of Santa Rita Rbad and Black Avenue, in an Alicationt.ex lainingey <br />Frost, of D & V Builders, Inc., spoke in favor of the app ~ p <br />that the propbeed sign is directional in nature rather than advertising. Chairman <br />Landon inqu~.red as to the permanency of the sign, whereupon Mr. Frost replied that <br />not more than five yeare~ timeCo~salonerdAntonini,baeconded bytCommisa~ioner from <br />the ai:diehce, it was moved by bell in giving <br />Lozano, and carried, that the public hearing be closed. Mr. Came , <br />the staff report, stated there ie some confusion in the minds of the staff with <br />regard to Zoning Ordinance requirements for aigna. Possibly there should be an <br />amendment to the Zoning Ordinance 1n the near future covering the matter of tract <br />aigna in general. The staff feels that from its interpretation of Section 17.705, <br />Ord. No. 309, it is the intent of the ordinance to permit tract signs up to 30 sq. <br />ft. in area in any zoning district; however, the proposed sign exceeds 30 aq.ft. <br />The front yard setback requirement in an A District ie 50 ft., whereas the appli- <br />cant proposes a 25-ft. setback. City Attorney Struthers was Urdinance,lbutfthate <br />situation. He stated there are contradictions in the Zoning <br />the Commission could grant a Conditional Uee Permit under Section 4.310 of said <br />ordinance, and set reasonable 1lmitations. After discussion by the Commission, <br />ingnre~solution wae~adoptedxbynunanimousevoteeofbthos~e Coammisaionerenpreaentfollow- <br />RESOLUTION N0. 301 <br />WHEREAS, the application of D ~ V Builders, Inc., 6000 Telegraph Ave., <br />Oakland, fox a Conditional Uee Permit in order to install a <br />temporary tract sign on property located northwesterly of the inter- <br />section of Santa Rita Road and Black Avenue, in an A District, has come <br />before this Commission; <br />NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: <br />1. <br />The above-named ConditionalottUition=e:~t is hereby granted <br />subject to the following <br />a. Avenue tocthe satisfactions of thekCity Engineer. <br />b. The Cenditional L'ee Permit is issued for a period <br />of five years. <br />c. The applicant must remove said sign upon 30 days <br />written notice prom the City of Pleasanton. <br />The next item on the aPermit with Site Plantand ArchitecturalDApprovallinbo der to <br />Hayward, for a Zoning rcel of ro arty located northwest of <br />construct 22 multiple dwelling unite on a pa p p the staff re- <br />827 Division Street, in an RG-25 Dlatrict. Mr. Campbell, in giving <br />port, stated that townhouse apartments are proposed to be constructed on the sub- <br />ject parcel. He explained the subject property has been rezoned from R-1 to flG-25 <br />by Ordinance No. 385, adopted March 23, 1964. A letter has been received from the <br />