PC 04/14/65 - Laserfiche WebLink

5. A sinn or plague acceptatle to the City Enginees must be erected cahich indicates all atra~t numbers of buildings to the rear of Pleasanton Avenue. Said sign or plaque must also receive approval of the Police Department. 6. The propesed parking space outlided in red pencil on the ante plan mint be eliminated, in order to facilitate use of. the entrance driveway. 7. The existing garage, which is indicated on the site plan to be moved, moat meet the requirements of Ordinance No. 309 and the Building Code or must be removed. 8. Approval of said Site Plan does nat include approval of the carport indicated thereon. Ms. Fales presented a referral from the Alameda County Planning Department, dated March 31, 1965, regarding the Tentative Subdivision Map of Tract No. 2556, which was submitted by volk-McLain Commuaitiea, Inc., and which will be considered by the County Planning Commission on April 26, 1965. Mr. Fales read the staff report wlth regard to the subject referral in which recommendations were made as to lot layout, streets, water service, utilities in general, and railroad location. Fol- lowing discussion by the Commission, it was moved by Chairman Landon, seconded by Commissioner Antonini, and carried, that the staff be instructed to transmit the recommendations to the Alameda County Planning Department. Mr. Fales read a referral from the Alameda County Planning Department, dated March 24, 1965, regarding the request of Roselma Bonds for an adjustment and approval of a building Bite with no frontage on an approved County road, which ie to be considered by the Alameda County Planning Commission on April 26, 1965. Mr. Fates read the staff report, which stated that the proposed use follows the General Plan, but it Ss difficult to determine how the proposed house location, easterly of Pleasanton Heights, would relate to the proposed future location of Pico Avenue, to easements which might be necessary across lands not owned by the applicant in order that public services mey be provided for the applicant's property, and to the utilization of septic tanks in this particular area. Following discussion by the Co~ieaion, it was moved by Chairman Lsndon, seconded by Commissioner Antonini, and carried, that the staff be instructed to transmit the recommendations ae pre- sented to the Alameda County Planning Department. There being no further business to come before the Commission, upon motion of Com- missioner Lozano, seconded by Commiasioner.•Rega, and carried, the meeting was adjourned at 11:05 P.M., to meet again on Wednesday, April 28, 1965, at 8:00 P.M.