PC 10/13/65 - Laserfiche WebLink

After study and discussion of the staff report and recommendations, upon motion of Chairman Landon, seconded by Comedesioner Johnston, the following resolution was adopted by unanimous vote. RESOLUTION N0. 472 RESOLVED; The City Planning Commission hereby recommends approval of Tentative Subdiviaion Map, Tract No. 2802 (Vintage Hilis) subject to rezoning, and subject to conditions as outlined by the staff in their report. Also in this connection, the City Planning Commission recommends to the City Council that the fence be 6' high, instead of the 4' high ae suggested by the Council. The next item on the agenda was the consideration of proposed amendment to the aub- divislon ordinance re: public service and elope easements in hillside subdivisions. Mr. Campbell presented the staff report. Upon motion of Chairman Landon, seconded by Commlaeioner Antonini, the following resolution was adopted by unanimous vote. RESOLUTION N0. 473 RESOLVED: The City Planning Commission hereby recommends to the City Council that Section 7.15 of the Subdiviaion Ordinance re- garding Public Service and Slope Easements in Hillside Subdivisions be amended by adding Paragraph 8 ae follows: "A public service easement greater than 8' in width adjacent to the street msy be required by the Planning Commission ae a condition of approval of the Tentative Map in order to accomodate landscaping, utilities or elope banks." The next item on the agenda was a referral from the City Council concerning off- atreet parking requirements of Ord. No. 309. Mr. Campbell presented the staff report stating that the City Council was concerned as to whether our present re- quirements for commercial uses are too h1gh. Mr. Campbell went on to say that revision of the Ordinance has been planned and will probably begin this month and should be completed next spring, and that the staff recommends no separate action to revise the Ordinance at this time. There are still other ways to provide for parking although certain requirements of the Ordinance should be changed. The City can also grant Variances to reduce the required amount of parking if it seems reasonable. It is the Planning Commission's decision that no action need be taken at this time. The following referrals were received from Alameda County: Mre. Ernest R. Jones, V-3485, adjustment to permit a building site in an "A-2" zone on a Lot which (1) has no frontage on approved street, (2) area reduced from required 5 acres to 4 scree; and concurrent use permit C-1581, for a kennel for 14 dogs and 8 cats in an A-2 District, at 1725 Roee Ave. Annexation proceedings are being initiated at this time for that area. It was the Commission's recommenda- tion that this application be disapproved. E. G. Kolb, V-3508, adjustment of 12'x32' advertising sign with 2'x32' rider, Highway 50, West of Highway 21, Pleasanton Township, in an A-2 zone; and Donald H. Stoneeon, V-3509, adjustment for a 10'x24' advertising with 2'x24' rider, in an A-2 zone, south corner of Highway 50 and Highway 21, Pleasanton Township - The Planning Commission recommended that these two applications be left Co the discre- tion of the County Planing Commission, and therefore the City Planning Commission would make no specific recommendation. Schulte-Blackwell Development Co., V-3510, for a 10'x24' sign with 2'x24' rider, Lot 2, Block 1, Tract 2724, northeast corner of Highway 21 and Highland Oaks Drive, 4.