PC 07/27/66 - Laserfiche WebLink

The next item on the agenda was further consideration of Livingston and Blayney report concerning Regulation of Mult-Family Dwelling Development. Mr. Edgar summarized the Livingston a nd Blayney report, dated May 20, 1966, breaking it down into tcao parts; First, the procedure for cocrvertin~ R-1 areas to R-6 which are General Planned R-6; and second, the standards for R-6 development. After consid- erable discussion, upon motion of Commissioner Arnold, seconded by Commissioner Garrigan, the following resolution was adopted by unanimous vote. RESOLUTION N0. 598 WHEREAS, the consideration of Mult-Family Dwelling Development has come before this Commission: NOW, Tl4;REFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: to adopt the four point procedure as outlined in the Livingston and Blayney report dated May 20, 1966. After further discussion concerning Part 2 of this report dealing with standards, it was determined to defer action on this matter until such time as the new Ordinance considerations and recommendations are presented. Mr. George Stanton, representing Associated Home Builders, was present in the audience and presented a rebuttal to the Livingston and Blayney report. Mr. Stanton also submitted a report to the Commission for their information. After further discussion, upon motion of Commis- sioner Arnold, seconded by Commissioner Johnston, and carried, the following motion was unanimously adopted. MOVED: to defer review of the section on standards until the new Zoning Ordinance has been reviewed. The next item on the agenda was the discussion of development plan; Stoneson Development Corporation. Mr. Edgar referred to the memorandum to the Planning Commission from the City Manager concerning this subject. Mr. Fairfield presented the plan for review and went on to explain the Regional Center and tenants. After considerable discussion, it was determined that there were no major conflicts in the plan presented that the Commission could determine at this time. The Commission determined to take a field trip to the Stoneson property to view the area and thereby it would enable the Commission to better make a decision when the Tentative Map is submitted. Under Matters for the Information of the Commission, Mr. Edgar requested the Commission to schedule a study session with the City Council, sometime before the middle of August, for the purpose of discussing shopping center eights. There being no further business to come before the Co~iasion, upon motion of Commissioner Johnston, seconded by Commissioner Arnold, and carried, the meeting was adjourned at 10:55 P.M., to meet again on Wednesday, AuBuat 10, 1966, at 8:00 P.M.