PC 01/25/67 - Laserfiche WebLink

NOW, THEREFORE, BB IT RESOLVED: that the above named application be approved. Sd. 2-67-1. J. Antoalni. The next item to be considered was the application of J. Antonia!, 374 Ray Street, for a Zoning Permit in order to install an advertizing sign in connection with an existing office use at the above address, in a C-C District. Mr. Spink presented the staff report which recommended approval. Upon motion of Commissioner Arnold, seconded by Commissioner Carrigan, and carried, it was determined that the Zoning Permit for J. Antonini be approved. Sc. 2-66-47. C. W. Blackburn. The next item to be considered was the application of C. W. Blackburn, 34 Castle- down Road, Castlewood Country Club, for a Zoning Permit with Site Plan, Landscape and Architectural Approval in order to construct a four-plea at 821 Palomino Drive, in an RG-25 District. Mr. Spink presented the staff report which asked for a continuance due to the fact that drawings had not been received and staff would appreciate adequate time to assimilate information pertaining to this item. Upon motion of Commissioner Carrigan, aecoaded by Commissioner Johnston, and carried, it was determined, with the consent of the applicant, to continue this matter in- definitely to allow the staff adequate time to evaluate the matter. 7. Cos®unicationa. The item discussed was a letter from Pleasanton Gardena, Inc., regarding a pro- posed development on Rottinger Avenue. Mr. Spink read the letter which re- quested a discussion on [hie matter. Mr. Bill Chriatner and Dr. Howard Long were present in the audience and stated that there would be approximately 40 unite on two scree of land for retired or low income persona. Dr. Long introduced several persons who were present in the audience and had an interest in the proposal under discussion. There was discussion as to how rezoning could be accomplished, by rezoning, planned unit development or amendment to the General Plaa. After this discussion, it was determined that the group should submit data relative to their proposal to Mr. Spink, who would review the information and prepare a report for the Planning Commission. There were no Referrals from Alameda County. 10 a. Referrals from Citv Council. Proposed Land Use Re: Two parcels of property owned by W. T. Marsh and proposed for annexation to City. Mr. Lee Amaral was present in the audience and asked for a continuance on this matter to allow Mr. Spink ample time to become acquainted with our area. Upon motion of Chairman Antonini, aecoaded by Co~isaioner Johnston, and carried, it was determined to continue this matter to the meeting of March 8, 1967, with the consent of the applicant. lla. Referrals from the Recreation and Park Co~iasion. This referral was to consider recommended criteria for a nature park to be developed at an existing park site at Valley Avenue and Northway Road. Mr. Spink presented the staff report which recov®eaded endorsement of the criteria for a nature park. Mr. Spink also read a letter from the Pleasanton Joint School District pertaining to this matter. Mr. Gary Patton, Director of Recreation, was present in the audience and spoke briefly relative to nature parka. Upon motion of Commissioner Johnston, seconded by Chairman Antonini, and carried, it was determined to recommend to the City Council that the criteria for nature parka be adopted, as submitted. At this point, Commissioner Johnston asked Mr. George Oakes whether or not developers might entertain the idea of setting aside areas in their developments for the elderly and low income persona. Mr. Oakes replied that he felt integration would be possible. There being no further business to come before the Co®isaion, upon motion of Commissioner Arnold, seconded by Commissioner Johnston, and carried, the meeting was ad'ourned at L0:55 P,M. to meet again on Wednesday, February 8, 1967, at 8:00 F.M. Secretary