|
office of the Pleasanton Elementary and the Amador Righ School Districts to be
<br />located at 625 Main Street in a C-C District. The staff report recommended
<br />approval with conditions. Mr. Haskell, Superintendent and representative of
<br />the School District, stated they were willing to work with the City, but felt
<br />that the School couldn't afford to meet the conditions. Mr. Plato stated his
<br />concern with the problem of street parking. UPON MOTION OF CQMPTiSSIOD~R PLATO,
<br />SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER GIBBS, AND CARRIED, THE ABOVE NAMED APPLICATION WAS
<br />APPROVED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
<br />1. An additional access be provided to the parking lot either from Division
<br />or St. Mary Street subject to the approval of the City Engineer.
<br />2. Grading, Leveling, and seal coating of the lot be accomplished.
<br />3. The building conform to all Code requirements.
<br />4. This Zoning Permit shall remain in effect so long as the School District is
<br />the tenant, but in no event more than three years.
<br />5. Landowner shall enter into agreement with City acknowledging that this
<br />Zoning Permit applies to the School M strict use only, and that a new Zoning
<br />Permit shall be required for future commercial use.
<br />6. Property owner shall enter into agreement promising to withhold protest for
<br />any future City parking district, in the event property owner has not pro-
<br />vided on-site parking sufficient to satisfy Zoning Ordinances in effect at
<br />that time.
<br />5f. Lea Fields, Z-67-50.
<br />The next item on the agenda was the application of Les Fields, 459 Main Street,
<br />Pleasanton, for a Zoning Permit in order to paint a sign on the side of a
<br />building. Mr. Edgar presented the staff report which indicated that this request
<br />was not reasonable. After further discussion, UPON MOTION OF COMMISSIONER PLATO,
<br />SECONDED BY CCt'.ND:SSIONER GARRIGAN, IT WAS DETERMINED THAT THE ABOVE NAMED APPLI-
<br />CATION BE DEtTiED. Roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Garrigan, Gibbs, Plato.
<br />NOES: None. ABSTAINED: Antonini. The applicant was not present in the audience,
<br />but will be advised of his right to appeal by letter.
<br />8a. Tract 2855 Costanzo Wilson Development Company.
<br />The next item on the agenda was the request of Costanzo Wilson Development Co.
<br />for Tentative Map approval, Tract 2855, for an area of approximately 41 acres
<br />adjacent to and westerly of Santa Rita Road and westerly of Valley Avenue.
<br />Mr. Sooby presented the staff report. The Commission was requested to Indicate
<br />their desires relative to density on multiple lots. After further discussion,
<br />UPON MOTION OF COPAD:SSIONER GARRIGAN, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER PLATO, AND CARRIED,
<br />IT WAS DETERMINED TO CONTINUE THIS MATTER TO THE MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 13, 1967.
<br />This was done with the consent of the applicant.
<br />86. Tract 2892, Longview.
<br />The next item on the agenda was a request for time extension for Tract 2892,
<br />Longview. Mr. Edgar presented the staff report which recommended that the
<br />request be granted. After further discussion, UPON MOTION OF COMMISSIONER PLATO.
<br />SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER GARRIGAN, AND CARRIED, IT WAS DETERMINED TO RECOMMEND
<br />TO THE CITY COUNCIL THAT THE ABOVE NAMED TIME EBTENSION BE GRANTED FOR A PERIOD
<br />OF ONE YEAR, TO AUGUST 10, 1968.
<br />9. Referrals from Alameda County.
<br />The next item was the referral from Alameda County Planning Commission relative
<br />to the 783rd Unit rezoning from H-1 to the C-0, located in the Dublin, Upper
<br />Amador Valley Planning Area. The Commission instructed the staff to inform the
<br />County Planning Commission that this area was not covered by the Pleasanton
<br />General Plan.
<br />10a. Referral from the Citv Council.
<br />The next item was a referral from the City Council pertaining to the proposed
<br />Park Planning Guide. Commissioner Garrigan spoke relative to the Guide and felt
<br />it should be approved. The Commission co~nended the Director of Recreation for a
<br />Guide that was very well done and very complete. UPON MOTION OF CHAIRMAN ANTCmiNi,
<br />SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER PLATO, AND CARRIED, IT WAS DETERMINED THAT THE PARR
<br />PLANNING GUIDE BE APPROVED.
<br />14. Matters Initiated by Commission Members.
<br />it was noted that a Vice Chairman had not been appointed to fill the vacant po-
<br />siticn. Upon motion of Chairman Antonini, seconded by Co®iasioner Garrigan,
<br />and carried, Commissioner Plato was elected as Vice-Chairman of the Planning
<br />Commission.
<br />There being no further business to come before the Commission, upon motion of
<br />Chairman Antonini, seconded by Commissioner Garrigan, and carried, the meeting
<br />was adjourned at 11:40 P.M., to meet. again on September 13, 1967 at 8:00 P. M.
<br />2 _
<br />ecreta 8-23-67
<br />
|