PC 11/08/67 - Laserfiche WebLink

i1I NU TE S of Planning Commission Pleasanton, California November 8, 1967 The regularlq scheduled meeting of the Planning Commission was called to order at 8:10 P.M., iAednesday, November 8, 1967, by Chairman Antonini. ROLL CALL showed the following: Present: Commissioner Arnold Garrigan Gibbs Plato Chairman Antonini Secretary Castro Upon motion of Commissioner Garrigan, seconded by Commissioner Gibbs, and carried, the minutes of November 1, 19b7, were approved as presented. 4. There were no revisions or omissions to the agenda. Sa. RZ-67-12, and Z-67-52 - D and V Builders. Chairman Antonini opened the public hearing on the application of D ~ V Builders, 6000 Telegraph Avenue, Oakland, For an amendment to Ordinance No. 309 amending the district boundaries of the Zoning Map by redesignating approximately 41 acres located on the east aide of Hopyard Road between Black Avenue and Valley Avenue from an "A" (Agricultural) DistricC to C-N, C-O, I~-15, RG-25 and R-2 (Commercial and Multi-family Garden Apartment) Districts. It was decided to consider at this time Z-b7-52, application of D & V Builders for a Zoning Permit with a Planned Unit Development Approval for approximately 41 acres located on the east side of Hopyard Road between Black Avenue and Valley Avenue in proposed C-N, C-0, RG-15 and R-2 Districts. Mr. Castro presented a staff report which recommended approval with conditions, and endorsed the proposal that the large apartment area located north of Valley Avenue be relocated rather than as depicted by the General Plan. There were several Pleasanton Valley homeocmers who spoke as follows: Jack Oterman, 5369 Ridgevale Road - concerned with high density on Black Avenue, adjacent to Harvest and Hopyard. Mr. Oterman felt there was a change of intent by the builders and was concerned that there were no available plans for the proposed apartment buildings. Mr. Oterman presented to the Commission a petition signed by 384 individuals, protesting the proposed apartment buildings. tor. Dudley Frost spoke briefly, indicating that the proposed units involved less density than allowed by the General Plan. Regarding traffic problems, Mr. Frost stated that intensive studies had been made of the roads in the area., and in particular Valley was capable of handling the increased traffic. tor. Jaeger, 5462 Ridgevale Road - concerned with property values when apartments are in the area. Don Klein, 1752 Tanglewood Way - stated he was not told adequately about possible apartments ip the area. - - .. Jim Eaton, 2234 Fairfield Road - stated his concern with apartments being located right behind him. Ted Landon, 5372 Ridgevale - objected to two story apartment buildings in the area. Expressed concern with apartments being located near schools. The audience was informed by the Commission that under the proposed P.U.D., the Commission had stringent control over site plan aid architecture of the apartments. Bill Garden, 2282 Fairfield Road - stated he had been assured there would be no apartments behind him. John Ball, 5498 Ridgevale Road - was told there would be garden apartments in a high price range. Upon motion of Commissioner Arnold, seconded by Cosmmisaioner Garrigan, and carried, the public hearing was closed. Upon motion of Commissioner Arnold, seconded by Chairman Antonini, the following resolution was adopted by unanimous vote: 11-8-67