PC 11/15/67 - Laserfiche WebLink

Mr. Frost questioned if the five percent required landscaping was excessive. After considerable discussion, it was changed to read in Section 2.111.6; "...not less than 3 percent...". At this point the public hearing on RZ-67-11 was continued to the meeting of December 6, 1967. 6d. 2-67-77 Curtis Gerton Realty, Inc, Application of Curtis Gerton Realty, Inc., 17401 Hesperian Boulevard, San Lorenzo, for a zoning permit with Site Plan, Architectural and Landscape Approval for a proposed office building complex, in a C-C District, to be located at 818 Main Street. After considerable discussion on the conditions, UPON MOTION OF COMMISSIONER GARRIGAN, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER GIBBS, AND CARRIED, IT WAS DETERMINED TO APPROVE 2-67-77 WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. That final architectural and Landscaping plans shall be re-submitted for staff and Commission approval. 2. That the applicant shall enter into an agreement with the City stating they would not be in opposition to the formation of a parking assessment district. 3. That all areas shown as parking shall be paved with asphaltic concrete. 4. That there shall be 13 customer parking spaces provided 9 feet by 19 feet in size, which shall be striped and bumper stopped. 5. That all curb openings shall meet the approval of the Public Works Director. 6. That new curb, gutter and sidewalk shall be provided by the applicant subject to the City's Standard Specifications and further subject to the approval of the Public LJOrks Director. 7. That a detailed site drainage plan be submitted prior to the issuance of a building permit, and subject to the approval of the Public Works Director. 8. That a property survey, describing the property, existing water meter box, and sanitary sewer lateral shall be submitted prior to the issuance of a building permit. 9. That the development shall be subject for underground electrical and communications services. 10. That only one-half of the proposed development shall be built at this time with the modification that the driveway shall be increased to 20 feet and off-street parking for 1/2 of the development shall be located along the northerly property line; provided, however, that if the applicant obtains an easement for egress to Ray Street subject to the approval of the Planning Commission, the developed plan shall stand as approved and as shown on the plot plan labeled Exhibit A. 12. MATTERS FOR THE INFORMATION OF THE C@IlNISSION The Commission considered a memorandum to the Planning Commission from the City Manager regarding the granting of credit for Private Neighborhood Park Developments. 1. It was felt that title to a private neighborhood recreation development should be mandatory title to the owner. 2. The Commission felt that such developments should each be judged on its own merits, location, and situation, rather than a required uniform minimian size. 3. They felt no specific requirements as Co the opening of private facilities to all families should be made; but each should be judged individually. It was decided to bring this matter before the Commission again when all members were present. There being no further business to come before the Commission, upon motion of Commissioner Carrigan, seconded by Chairman Antonini, and carried, the meeting was adjourned at 10:05 P.M. to meet again on Tuesday, November 21, 1967. -3-