Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Otis Nostrand, addressed the City Council, extended compliments to staff for putting together a <br />world class model and report, felt accurate information was critical in making sound decisions <br />and the programs and assumptions used provide a solid foundation to move forward. <br />Regarding whether or not Stoneridge Drive should remain in the General Plan, he concludes it <br />should when all questions are considered and answered. He asked the Council and <br />Commission to join him and many other residents and business people throughout town and <br />say yes to keep Stoneridge Drive in the General Plan. <br /> <br />Jason Weinstein, addressed the City Council, is a civil engineer and worked with the <br />Department of Transportation and currently works for MTC, said he is trying to look at all data <br />as an engineer, but as a resident, he was a NIMBY. He said his personal feeling is he cannot <br />decide whether or not it should be extended. He would rather it not because he lives there, but <br />then it might be beneficial to the community at large. He also thinks that based on its timeframe, <br />it might likely be better served to not be in the General Plan and added later, given there are <br />plenty of improvements along SR 84, 580 and 680 that need to occur before this is beneficial. <br />He spent a decade working in Fremont and in Oakland and he actually cut-through’s <br />neighborhood himself. He felt it was a regional issue, thinks the $3.5 to $7 million it would cost <br />would be better used for a westbound 580 to southbound 680 direct connector, acknowledged <br />circulation issues, but felt that while it might be beneficial to extend Stoneridge it should be <br />during the next general plan update because at least it won’t occur before all other <br />improvements do. <br /> <br />Kara Simone, addressed the City Council, said she lives in another area of the city and was <br />concerned about traffic in general in the city. We all have to understand traffic will increase due <br />to population increases, businesses are building in every direction and in order to move traffic <br />efficiently, she feels more roads are needed to go through the city so that traffic is more <br />distributed throughout the city. It is unfair to make certain neighborhoods have extremely bad <br />traffic while not sharing the burden in other areas, requested additional routes to be built to get <br />home, said she currently uses Valley, Santa Rita or Stanley Boulevard and would like more <br />alternatives. She was told she was a cut-through driver and was very offended and asked for a <br />definition of cut-through traffic and said she just wants to get home like everyone. She asked to <br />have the traffic move the best it can and have everyone share the burden. <br /> <br />Bill O’Hare, addressed the City Council, said he lives in the Valley/Santa Rita area and he was <br />there when Valley Avenue did not go through. He said Stoneridge was built as an arterial, it is 4 <br />lanes, one side has no houses, and felt it was not reasonable to take it out of the General Plan. <br />Only having one route to the east will always condemn the center part of the city to excessive <br />traffic. He moved to where he lives to walk to stores, restaurants, and other areas and now, <br />crosswalks are being taken away, additional lanes at Valley and Santa Rita will are going in to <br />carry the traffic making it more of a nuisance, and felt the neighborhood would be split away <br />from its services residents could previously walk to and asked for this to be considered. Also <br />discussed are the additional cars on Stoneridge and he felt it would simply be a transfer from <br />the business park, he felt this was funded and not unreasonable, asked the Council to keep <br />their options open in building the extension, and include the extension in the General Plan. <br /> <br />John Butara, addressed the City Council, said he was against the extension, said he does not <br />live near it but the area is Lasing a lot of its separation. He cannot believe the amount of <br />housing being developed and felt ABAG was a silent developer. He felt it the extension is built, <br />they will come. He agreed there were plans in the past, but it is okay to say a mistake had been <br />made. He said Staples Ranch will always be there as an investment, people are getting older <br /> <br />Workshop Minutes 21 April 24, 2007 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />