My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
01
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2007
>
061907
>
01
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2007 2:58:12 PM
Creation date
6/15/2007 2:58:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
6/19/2007
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
01
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
safety committee for 10 years and is trying to resolve safety issues with the City. She said there <br />are 800 children who go to Moore School, Hacienda School is the only one that is on the <br />highway and Amador and Harvest Park are within 50 feet and in some cases 100 feet of a major <br />intersection. She said the data point not addressed is, extending Stoneridge Drive significantly <br />reduces the risk when compared to not extending it to children traveling to and from school. She <br />asked that the Council seek an opinion from the school board so they can weigh in on the issue. <br /> <br />Valerie Arkin, addressed the City Council, said the intersections harmed with the extension for <br />both AM and PM commute times are Valley and Crestline, Hanson and Valley, Nail and First, <br />West Las Positas and Foothill, Gilbralta and Hopyard, Valley Trails North and Hopyard, Bernal <br />and 680, Cole Center and Valley, West Las Positas and Muirwood, Bernal and Pleasanton <br />Avenue, Foothill High School and Foothill Boulevard, Sunol and 680, West Las Positas and <br />Coronado, and Valley and Comb. She felt everyone wants to improve the situation on Valley, <br />but she felt this was not the solution. Also, once the extension is put in it cannot be taken out, <br />she does not think this is good for all of Pleasanton, and she felt one cannot compare Amador <br />with Moore Elementary school because of the ages of children, strollers, bikes, etc. and felt the <br />extension was not the answer. <br /> <br />James Scanlin, addressed the City Council, said he moved 4 years ago to Pleasanton and one <br />thing that drew him was the sense of community from the downtown and the fact there is a <br />physical boundary around the city and not putting through the extension would help preserve <br />this sense. He works in Hayward, gets off at Center Street and drive through Hayward for 20 <br />minutes to avoid the freeway traffic, and felt many would rather drive through city streets than sit <br />on freeway traffic. He felt the plan only looked at the arterials, as he lives on Rheem Drive and <br />Moore/Camp/Rheem was a way to get around the Stoneridge/Santa Rita intersection, so people <br />would start doing this, and felt people would find secondary streets to use and not just arterials. <br />Two reasons to pull this out of the general plan would be preserving the sense of community <br />and preventing cut-through traffic. <br /> <br />Sharrell Michelotti, addressed the City Council, former Planning Commissioner and <br />Councilmember, said she and many people welcome all existing and new residents and felt the <br />overall picture should be looked at. Regarding the Las Positas plan, it has homes fronting the <br />entire way and Stoneridge Drive was designed to have 6 lanes of traffic with landscaping. The <br />general plan in 1996 has a circulation element. Stoneridge Drive was not planned for people <br />who are on the freeway, but residents in the city so they could use alternatives to get to <br />Livermore. She felt the business park has provided many benefits and jobs, felt residents should <br />look at the benefits from the park that residents enjoy because of the park, felt regional <br />improvements are needed and she urge the Council to pursue improvements, urged the City to <br />not take Stoneridge Drive out of the general plan as it is a major part of the circulation element. <br />She felt Stoneridge was a much needed arterial and felt the benefits would serve all residents. <br /> <br />Jan Batcheller, addressed the City Council, said she first spoke on the topic 4 years ago and <br />since she has watched the cost of the general plan review and urged the Council to wind it up <br />and get it going. She said the 1986 General Plan was award-winning and serves as the basis <br />from which to start, as well as a wonderful 1996 General Plan, and she urged the Council not to <br />disregard what all people in the past have done. She felt the community was unique, asked for <br />respect to those who planned and plotted the first plans. Those with homes along Stoneridge <br />Drive have them because of the road put in and all traffic studies done 20 years ago indicated it <br />was required. Now the homes are here and we must follow through with the circulation. She <br />asked to please leave Stoneridge Drive in the General Plan as it shows respect to those before <br />us and those who will follow us. <br /> <br />Workshop Minutes 20 April 24, 2007 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.