My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
23 ATTACHMENT 2
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2007
>
061907
>
23 ATTACHMENT 2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2007 11:07:18 AM
Creation date
6/15/2007 11:02:33 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
6/19/2007
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
23 ATTACHMENT 2
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DrafF 14. Subregional Planning Element <br />directors), private sector leaders (including the Tri-Valley Business Councill and other <br />community leaders (including education) - with all parties focused on the talent, <br />entrepreneurial business support, and quality of life necessary to sustain the region's <br />innovation-based economv." <br />The report further concludes: <br />"To succeed as a region whose comparative advantage is entrepreneurship and innovation <br />rather than primarily strategic location or low costs Tri Valley must have a strong innovation <br />`habitat' - a combination of talented people a strong pipeline of ideas and funding, and <br />supportive lace-based attributes such as housing, transportation and quality of life." <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> > , <br /> <br /> > , <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />To continue this economic success the Tri-Valley area must ensure an adequate supply of affordable <br />housing within a reasonable commuting distance of Tri-Valley robs. One of the strateeies <br />recommended in the Tri-Valley Business Council's report is to reduce the impediments to retaining <br />innovative talent in the Tri Valley by improving housing affordability. <br />Fiscal Revenues <br />In recent years it has become increasingly difficult fox local governments to collect adequate revenues <br />to cover the costs of providing services to residents and businesses. The amount of revenues available, <br />especially from property taxes, has been substantially reduced, while the cost of providing services has <br />continued to increase. As a result, local governments have come to rely more heavily on other sources <br />of revenue, thus altering their approach to land=use planning and development. <br />Some local governments are now tending to place a greater emphasis on the fiscal impacts of land use <br />decisions and a reduced emphasis on creating balanced communities. Many have encouraged <br />commercial development in order to increase sales tax revenues, or have sought industrial or high-end <br />residential development which tend to bring in greater property tax revenue. The push fox revenue- <br />generating development has encouraged rapid urban expansion, and has created competition among <br />jurisdictions fox projects. Among the consequences ate a lack of affordable housing, and traffic <br />congestion because of the long commutes between housing and jobs. <br />Subregional Planning 060507, redline 1FI114-14 CilyCouncil6/5/2007 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.