My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
09 ATTACHMENT 06-8
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2007
>
061907
>
09 ATTACHMENT 06-8
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2007 10:59:22 AM
Creation date
6/15/2007 9:49:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
6/19/2007
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
09 ATTACHMENT 6-8
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DRAFT <br />Commissioner Blank suggested added the following condition: "Special lighting will be <br />allowed but must not be a nuisance and may only be used during dining hours." <br />Commissioner Narum suggested additional signage to direct drivers to the restaurant. <br />Ms. Decker noted that Condition No. 14 on page 21 addressed a sign program that must come <br />back to the Planning Department. She noted that idea could be strongly supported with respect <br />to directional signage. Commissioner Blank suggested the addition of the following language: <br />"The sign program shall include directional signage for vehicular traffic." <br />Commissioner Narum would support the addition of language for temporary directional signage. <br />Chairperson Fox noted that she would support staff's recommendation for the R-1-20,000 and, <br />therefore, would not support this motion although she supported the project. <br />Ms. Decker summarized the motion as follows: <br />• Find that the project will not have a significant effect on the environment and has a de <br />minimus impact on the site's wildlife and to recommend approval of the Negative <br />Declaration for the project; <br />• Find that the proposed major modification to the PUD development plan is consistent with <br />the General Plan and the purposes of the PUD Ordinance; make the PUD findings as <br />identified in the staff report, and recommend approval of Case PUD-93-02-09M, subject <br />to the conditions of approval as shown in Exhibit B-1; <br />• Make the conditional use findings as stated in the staff report and recommend approval of <br />Case PCUP-182, subject to the conditions of approval as shown in Exhibit B-2, including <br />the amendments in the staff memo to the Planning Commission, dated May 9, 2007; <br />• Modify Condition No. 7 of Exhibit B-2 to replace the language prohibiting heating lamps <br />and/or special lighting with the following language: "Special lighting will be allowed but <br />must not be a nuisance and may only be used during dining hours"; <br />• Add a new condition to Exhibit B-2 requiring that the full menu be made available at all <br />times that alcoholic beverages are served; <br />• Add a new condition to Exhibit B-1 that the site development standards be those of the <br />R-1-20,000 with a maximum habitable area not to exceed 6,600 square feet and a <br />700-square-foot garage exemption. <br />• Delete Condition No. 28 of Exhibit B-1 regarding payment for the loss of existing <br />non-heritage trees on the site. <br />ROLL CALL VOTE: <br />AYES: Commissioners Blank, Narum, Olson, and Pearce. <br />NOES: Commissioners Fox. <br />ABSTAIN: None. <br />RECUSED: None. <br />ABSENT: None. <br />DRAFT EXCERPTS: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, May 9, 2007 Page 6 of 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.