09 ATTACHMENT 06-8 - Laserfiche WebLink

DRAFT dated May 9, 2007, and the following amendments: (1) Modify Condition No. 7 to replace the language prohibiting heating lamps and/or special lighting with the following: "Special lighting will be allowed but must not be a nuisance"; and (2) Add a new condition requiring that the full menu be made available at all times when alcoholic beverages are served. Chairperson Fox seconded the motion. Ms. Decker requested that the Planning Commission amend Condition No. 4 which was not addressed in the staff memo, addressing payment of sewer fees to the City of Livermore/City of Pleasanton. Commissioner Blank and Chairperson Fox accepted the proposed amendment Ms. Decker requested that a condition be added to clarify in the PUD guidelines whether or not the home should comply with the R-1-6,500 or the R-1-20,000 standard. Commissioner Blank and Chairperson Fox indicated their preference for the R-1-20,000 standard. Commissioner Blank suggested the language "not to exceed 6,600 square feet." Chairperson Fox stated that she could support that language. Ms. Decker recommended that the Planning Commission consider a garage exemption of approximately 700 square feet as is typical for contemporary custom homes. Chairperson Fox noted that she would support the R-1-20,000 standard, plus the addition suggested by Ms. Decker. However, if the percentages were to exceed the R-1-20,000, she would like the matter to return to the Planning Commission rather that have astaff--level design review. She noted that the neighbors indicated that the smaller homes were at the front area of Ruby Hill. Ms. Decker suggested supporting the proposed design review process as a staff-level review rather than atwo-phase process. She advised that this project was for a recommendation by the Planning Commission, not an approval. Chairperson Fox reiterated that she would prefer it to be R-1-20,000 and would not be able to support to the amendment. She retracted her second to the initial motion. Commissioner Narum seconded the amended motion. Commissioner Pearce did not believe the $5,500 fee for removing non-heritage tree was in the spirit of the Heritage Tree Ordinance and proposed that Condition No. 28 of Exhibit B-1 be deleted. Commissioners Blank and Narum accepted the proposed amendment. Chairperson Fox inquired whether the restaurant and house could be the subject of separate votes. Ms. Decker noted that would not be advisable because it was one PUD. DRAFT EXCERPTS: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, May 9, 2007 Page 5 of 7