Laserfiche WebLink
June 27, 1989 <br /> <br />Mr. Lawrence H. Miller <br />Director of Personnel <br />City of Pleasanton <br />123 Main Street <br />P.O. Box 520 <br />Pleasanton, CA 94566 <br /> <br />IRC Section 89 Compliance <br /> <br />Dear Larry, <br /> I appreciate the opportunity to provide you with our proposal to assist the City of <br />Pleasanton (the City) in achieving compliance with the qualification rules under IRC <br />Section 89. As a law fn'm practicing solely in the field of employee benefits, we are <br />uniquely qualified to assist the City in this matter. <br /> <br /> Section 89 Qualification Requirements <br /> <br />As you know, Internal Revenue Code Section 89, states five requirements the City must <br />meet to assure that the benefits it provides to its employees are provided on a tax favored <br />basis. Briefly these requirements are as follows: <br /> <br /> 1. the plans must be in writing; <br /> 2. the plans must be reasonably communicated; <br /> 3. the City must intend them to be permanent; <br /> 4. the plans must be for the exclusive benefit of the City's employees and their <br /> dependents; <br /> 5. the plans must be legally enforceable. <br /> <br />The law also requires that the plans be communicated to the employees in a unified wrap- <br />around document. <br /> <br /> If these requirements are not met, employees who participate in-the plan will be <br />required to include in income the full cost of the employer provided benefits. Proposed <br />legislation would change this penalty to an excise tax payable by the employer. <br /> <br /> Under present law, the City must be in compliance under items 1,2, and 3 as of <br />October 1, 1989 and items 4 and 5 and the wrap-around document as of the first day of <br />the City's 1990 plan year. <br /> <br /> <br />