My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 03/11/70
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1970-1979
>
1970
>
PC 03/11/70
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/19/2017 10:49:32 AM
Creation date
5/2/2007 8:44:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
3/11/1970
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 03/11/70
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
4~~sAN~~y <br />CITY of PLEASANTON <br />\ ..~ • <br />.~ <br />*° Planning Commission <br />~..o <br />MINUTES ~OF REGULAR MEETING. <br />Da1@ ; March 11, 1970 <br />Time : silo PM <br />Pia C8: Pleasanton Justice Court <br />Women's Club be permitted to construct the <br />bus shelter, according to a design prepared <br />by the Planning Department. <br />A motion to that effect was entered and <br />passed. <br />REFERRALS FROM Application by Fred Bertetta, Jr., Et A1, an tion: <br />ALAMEDA COUNTY Evangelical Free Church of Dublin, Inc., for econded: <br />a conditional use permit to establish a com- yes: <br />munity facility-church and accessory Sunday oes: <br />School facilities in an A (Agricultural) bsent: <br />District, located at Martin Avenue, west sid bstain: <br />550 ft. north of the intersection with Santa <br />Rita Avenue, Pleasanton Area, Pleasanton <br />Township. <br />The Planning Director advised the Commission <br />that a phone call had been received from one <br />individual objecting to this application. <br />Mrs. Vesta Fish, was present to represent <br />the applicant. <br />There were several objections, from a <br />Mr. Cooper and an unidentified lady, both <br />residents in the vicinity who would be <br />affected by this proposed Church facility. <br />These individuals were advised to carry thei <br />objections to the hearing before Alameda <br />County, where the final disposition of the <br />matter would be made. <br />A motion was entered and passed advising the <br />County that the Planning Commission would <br />have no recommendations to'offer, but that <br />should the County be disposed to approving <br />this application, that the design plans be <br />forwarded to the City for review. <br />MATTERS INITIATED This concerned problems with several signs <br />BY COMMISSION which are in violation of Design Review or <br />MEMBERS administrative approvals. <br />- 9 - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.