PC 07/13/71 - Laserfiche WebLink

4y$A3A1yT0y CITY of PLEASANTON ~~; . `~~~~° Planning Commission • `p t MINUTES ~OF REGULAR MEETING. D Ot8 July 13, 1971 Time : s;oo PM PIOCe: pleasanton Justice Court Attorney's solution was workable and adequat The City has received a $2,000 personal chec from Mr. Grotenhuis in case he doesn't meet those requirements previously imposed by the Design Review Board or Staff within 14 days. Mr. Castro further advised the Commission that the letter prepared by the City Attorne has not been signed by Mr. Grotenhuis and that this would be essential to release any of the units for final occupancy or to lift the stop work order. He further advised the Commission that the bond fn the amount of $2,000 supposedly is to cover the painting, drainage and other matters that were not resolved by Mr. Grotenhuis. Commissioner Hirst asked what happens after thirty days. Mr. Castro advised him that the manner in which the letter is written, the applicant has 14 days to resolve the pro- blems. If not, the City then has the right to collect the money and make any necessary improvements. Commissioner Pereira felt that the City should require a 100% Performance Bond. Commissioner Hirst stated that he went out to the job site and feels that Mr. Grotenhuis has made some steps to correct the deficienci Mr. Grotenhuis addressed the Commission. He stated that the building which is now being worked on was not part of the stop work order. He further indicated that when the stop work order was made, wiring had already taken place. Chairman Garrigan corrected him by saying that it was his understanding that the stop work order was for the entire project. Mr. Grotenhuis disagreed. Mr. Castro confirmed the fact that the stop work order is essentially being applied to the entire project. 's. -3-