Laserfiche WebLink
4y$~sAN~°y C TY of PLEASANTON <br />I <br />~~° Plannin Commission <br />~l.M f0 f <br />-° g <br />MINUTES ~OF REGULAR MEETING. <br />DGte : January 25, 1972 <br />Time : 7:00 <br />FIaCe: Pleasanton Justice Court <br />resources of the underground water basin <br />must be guaranteed by Kaiser that if in fact <br />the basin is injured, Kaiser will stand <br />behind the mechanism in which they can <br />correct this problem. <br />These points should be considered by the <br />Commission in a policy position to Alameda <br />County. <br />Vice Chairman indicated that no statements <br />have been forthcoming from any other agency <br />so far, regarding the possibility of transfer <br />stations if this property is not annexed to <br />the City. He feels this is a matter which <br />should be very seriously considered by the <br />City. <br />Commissioner Hirst feels annexation is a for <br />gone conclusion. He feels the permit should <br />be a renewable one every 5 or 10 years, as <br />there may be problems accruing which are <br />objectionable from a community standpoint. <br />He generally concurred with the City Manager <br />outline. <br />Vice Chairman Pons generally concurred with <br />Mr. Edgar's proposal. If any type of a <br />positive recommendation comes forth, it woul~ <br />have to be a unanimous approval from all the <br />agencies before the Commission should venture <br />any kind of a final determination and policy <br />statement. Mr. Pons also touched on the <br />possibility of an indemnity bond. He felt <br />that the City should definitely share in all <br />(monetary benefit that can be obtained. If <br />(there are further benefits in the form of a <br />igolf course or recreational lands, the City <br />'should have those as well. <br />Mr. Corley, attorney for Kaiser on this <br />application, then spoke stating that perhaps <br />the City should look not only to monetary <br />benefits from this operation, but at the <br />_ 20 _ <br />