Laserfiche WebLink
4y$~BA~T°y CITY of PLEASANTON <br />~~o <br />.~.:o..o Planning Commission <br />MINUTES ~OF REGULAR MEETING. <br />DGte : June 13 , 1972 <br />Time ; 8 ~ 35 P .M. <br />PIGCe; Pleasanton Justice Court <br />Commissioner McLain wished to know <br />whether this Reconnaissance Report <br />will be coordinated with the current <br />General Plan review. Secretary Castro <br />informed him that the material devel- <br />oped will be reviewed by Livingston <br />& Blayney. As far as development of <br />any physical plan for the C.B.D., thi <br />was not part of the contract between <br />Pleasanton and Livingston & Blayney. <br />However, an implementation program <br />is needed now. <br />Commissioner McLain suggested that the <br />study be coordinated with the Housing <br />Authority as far as funding from HUD. <br />Also, what are the City's plans as <br />far as preservation of historical <br />buildings. Secretary Castro advised <br />him that the City is taking care of <br />,these matters and has been in contact <br />with the Housing Authority people. <br />Commissioner Pons raised the question <br />how funding from HUD could be obtaine , <br />and Commissioner Pereira indicated th t <br />this funding applied primarily to <br />urban core areas rather than a com- <br />munity like Pleasanton. It was point d <br />out, however, that the City of Pitts- <br />burg had received a grant for $5 mill on <br />for commercial and mall systems and <br />also for historical grants for pre- <br />servation of these historical sites. <br />Chairman Carrigan indicated that it <br />is clear the City could not afford <br />to wait much longer before making a <br />final decision as to implementation <br />of the downtown area. <br />Reiteration of support by the Plannin <br />Commission to the staff to continue <br />with Report 2 of the C.B.D. revitali- <br />zation program was made. <br />-4 - <br />