My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 08/08/72
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1970-1979
>
1972
>
PC 08/08/72
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/30/2017 11:45:22 AM
Creation date
4/30/2007 4:12:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
8/8/1972
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 08/08/72
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
4~$ASA~TOy CITY of PLEASANT~N <br />~~o <br />.:.:o.•~ Planning Commission <br />MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING. <br />DCte : August 8, 1972 <br />Time : 8:00 P.M. <br />PIGCe; Pleasanton Justice Court <br />he felt the Commission should deny <br />their application in order that both <br />sites can be reviewed by Council. <br />The time element for construction <br />and completion of the center is - <br />two-three years for construction wi <br />possible completion date of early <br />1976 depending upon achievement of <br />City services. <br />There being no further comments, the <br />Public Hearing was closed. <br />Vice Chairman Pons expressed concern <br />about the precise designation of RM-2 <br />for the multiples. It was his feelin <br />that without resolution of the school <br />site situation, the overall density <br />should be left undetermined at this <br />time. <br />Commissioner Pereira felt that multi- <br />ples would be appropriate buffer <br />between the commercial and the <br />freeway. It is unfair to the appli- <br />cant and to the City and to the <br />School District to rezone that area <br />to a specific zoning district de- <br />signation at this time. It too was <br />his feeling that the PUD Multiple <br />designation would be appropriate, <br />until the needs of the community are <br />ascertained. He would like to see a <br />specific plan on whatever density <br />is chosen as the buffer to the <br />regional center is important. <br />Vice Chairman Pons asked about the <br />phasing of the development. Will <br />the center be developed first or will <br />it be concurrent with the residential <br />development? Mr. Fairfield indicated <br />that the intent is to develop both <br />together, predicated, of course, on <br />other factors. <br />-12- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.