My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 11/14/72
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1970-1979
>
1972
>
PC 11/14/72
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/30/2017 11:44:51 AM
Creation date
4/30/2007 4:01:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
11/14/1972
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 11/14/72
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
4y$~3AJVToy CITY of PLEASANTON <br />~ ~ '~~ • <br />`~~*~° Planning Commission <br />...o. <br />MINUTES ~OF REGULAR MEETING. <br />Date : November 14, 1972 <br />Time : 8 ~ 05 P .M. <br />PIOCe: Pleasanton Justice Court <br />assess the impact of the Livermore <br />Airport expansion on this Valley. <br />The Commissioners reiterated to Mr. <br />Lee that this body is concerned with <br />and opposed to increase in air traffic <br />and all ramifications that are part <br />of these factors. <br />Commissioner McLain wished to know wh< <br />guarantee Pleasanton has if after the <br />study has been completed Livermore <br />decides to go ahead with any expansion <br />deemed necessary, even if this would <br />be of detriment to Pleasanton? Mr. <br />Lee answered that the planning area <br />has been established by the Airport <br />Land Use Commission. It was further <br />pointed out that the Valley's repre- <br />sentative on this commission is a <br />Dr. Shirley of Livermore. <br />'ISecretary Castro described for the <br />Commission the procedures the staffs <br />iof the agencies involved plan to <br />!adhere to in the completion of this <br />,study . <br />Some discussion ensued regarding the <br />apparent lack of participation on <br />Pleasanton's part at this time. Sec- <br />retary Castro stated that both Pleas- <br />anton and Livermore are very much away <br />of the study that is currently being <br />undertaken. The Valley Planning <br />Committee has discussed this matter <br />at some length and these are the kind <br />of studies that that body will be <br />addressing itself to in the future. <br />The suggestion was then made that <br />perhaps Mr. Lee could report back to <br />the Livermore Council what Pleasanton <br />feelings are and that participation <br />be afforded Pleasanton in the formu- <br />t <br />Gs <br />-e <br />s <br />-3- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.