My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 06/13/73
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1970-1979
>
1973
>
PC 06/13/73
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/30/2017 11:51:18 AM
Creation date
4/30/2007 3:45:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
6/13/1973
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 06/13/73
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
CITY of PLEASANTON <br />Planning Commission <br />MINUTES ~OF REGULAR MEETING. <br />~a1e : June 13, 1973 <br />Time : 9:0o P. M. <br />PIOCB~ Pleasanton Justice Court <br />Mr. Harris presented revised site plans for <br />the Trinity Lutheran Church on Hopyard and <br />Golden Roads for the Commission's informati <br />REFERRALS FROM :Referral -Application of Stella Beratlis - <br />ALAMEDA COUNTY reclassify from "A" to "M" District an <br />approximately 2.3 acre parcel located at <br />3830, 3862 and 3876 Santa Rita Road, <br />Pleasanton. <br />he staff had nothing to add to the staff <br />eport. <br />lthough this is not a Public Hearing, <br />r. Joseph Madden, 3851 Vineyard Avenue, <br />equested and received permission to speak. <br />He was concerned about one aspect. He felt <br />that when property is contiguous to a City, <br />that it should be annexed to the City. He <br />further indicated that in the past five years <br />he has seen several official studies and each <br />one involved some sort of transportation or <br />road network of some kind. This can be <br />vital to the City. <br />Mr. Madden emphasized that annexation should <br />be seriously considered in this particular <br />case or other similar circumstances. <br />Commissioner Garrigan concurred with this <br />line of reasoning; as did Acting Chairman <br />Pereira who felt that the City should be <br />processing a presoning application on the <br />properties as it is within the General Plan <br />area. All told there are eleven parcels <br />involved. <br />The City Attorney indicated that since this <br />la nd is within the sphere of the City of <br />Pleasanton, the County should encourage the <br />applicant to initiate annexation. But the <br />City, at this point, cannot take any other <br />action other than assuming a strong position <br />as to how they feel on the matter. <br /> <br /> <br />j <br />~ ! f <br />I ~ . <br />i~ <br />I ! <br />t <br />i <br />i <br />-9- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.