Laserfiche WebLink
"'"'~ CIT'Y of PLEASANTON <br />Planning Commission <br />MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING. <br />~CtB June 13, 1973 <br />Time : 9:00 P.M. <br />PLO C8; Pleasanton Justice Court <br />Commissioner McLain also brought up the <br />question of desirability of the City having <br />design control on the proposed development. <br />Acting Chairman Pereira noted that although <br />it is not yet State Law, many progressive <br />cities and counties in California have a <br />policy of not considering a zone change <br />unless both the City/County involved have <br />their posit ions clearly noted. <br />Mr. Scheidig stated that Senator Nejedly <br />is proposing such a bill. <br />Commissioner Garrigan felt the City Attorney <br />should direct a letter to the County expressi <br />the Commission's feeling regarding this <br />application. <br />Mr. Harris also stated that in line with the <br />encouragement of annexation by the applicant <br />to the City, should a copy of such letter go <br />to City Council? Commissioner Garrigan felt <br />this would be a good agenda item if the <br />Council wished to review it. <br />'Acting Chairman Pereira suggested that a <br />copy of the City's C-S ordinance should be <br />forwarded to the County also. <br />~Mr. Campbell suggested that perhaps the <br />(Council would like to take this as a matter <br />of policy and also write to the LAFC, as <br />well as the Board of Supervisors. He further <br />noted that all improvements to the parcel <br />would have to come from the City. <br />It was finally decided that the City Attorn <br />would draft a letter for either the Acting <br />Chairman's or the Chairman's signature, to <br />County, City Council requesting adoption of <br />a policy. Mr. Pereira requested that City <br />Attorney draft the policy which should be <br />reviewed by Council and the Board of <br />Supervisors. <br />-10- <br />