My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 06/13/73
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1970-1979
>
1973
>
PC 06/13/73
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/30/2017 11:51:18 AM
Creation date
4/30/2007 3:45:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
6/13/1973
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 06/13/73
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
CITY of PLEASANTON <br />Planning Commission <br />MINUTES ~OF REGULAR MEETING. <br />~Gte June 13, 1973 <br />Time : 9:00 P.M. <br />PIaCB; Pleasanton Justice Court <br />ZONING PERMIT Edward Schlies/Donald Clemetson - applicatio otion: <br />Z-73-31, Continued to to allow the construction of a 30,000 sq.ft. econded: <br />next meeting. office building on property located at the yes: <br />northeast corner of Mohr Avenue and Santa oes: <br />Rita Road, zoning for the property being bsent: <br />0 (Office) District. bstain: <br />The Public Hearing was opened. <br />Mr. Michael O'Hearn, designer for this <br />submittal, was present to speak. <br />Acting Chairman Pereira wished to clarify <br />whether a designer rather than a licensed <br />architect, is permitted to design commercial <br />and industrial development. It was his <br />recollection that a licensed designer cannot <br />do work on any structures other than for <br />residences (single family and multiple). <br />Mr. O'Hearn indicated that his outfit works <br />with a structural engineer. Chairman Pereir <br />stated that he was not certain the Commissio <br />could rule on this submittal under those <br />circumstances, since he did not note on the <br />drawings any signature by a structural engi- <br />neer; or see a soils report. <br />Some discussion followed and Mr. Scheidig <br />stated that in the design review stage, it <br />is not required that structural drawings <br />need to be presented. This phase is handled <br />through the Building Division. <br />Considerable discussion followed on the <br />legality of reviewing the design plans. <br />Acting Chairman Pereira also wondered, with <br />the expansive nature of the soil in the area <br />where this structure is to occur, what would <br />happen if the design as presented is not <br />workable structurally. <br />The applicant's representative spoke next. <br />He had questions regarding the type of <br />burglar alarm system to be provided. <br />~\ <br />li I I I <br />j' ~` ~ <br />1' <br />~ I <br />Commissioner McLain had a question concerni <br />-4- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.