Laserfiche WebLink
CITY of pLEASANTON <br />Planning Commission <br />MINUj~$ ~~pF REGU _AR MEETING, <br />DGte ~ November 21, 1973 <br />Time; 7:3o P.M. <br />Piccej Pleasanton Justice Court <br />Mr. Chuck Seymour, member of the CAC <br />spoke. He concurred with Mr. Andrew <br />remarks, and directed his remarks to <br />the discrepancies outlined by both <br />Mr. Harris and Mr. Andrews. He felt <br />that there is the basic fact of <br />philosophy to be considered as well. <br />At this point, the Chairman inter- <br />rupted Mr. Seymour to advise him <br />that he would like him to confine <br />his comments to matters of major <br />importance, since the Commission was <br />in the position of having to formu- <br />late their position to pass on to <br />City Council. The Chairman felt tha <br />all minority comments should be made <br />to that body, rather than to the <br />Commission. Mr. Seymour attempted <br />to present some background surround- <br />ing these problems, but in light <br />of Chairman Pereira's remarks, he <br />opted to make his comments to <br />City Council instead. <br />Some discussion ensued regarding the <br />advisability of. going into the back- <br />ground of these matters, and a lady <br />in the audience spoke in favor of <br />it. However, the Chairman explained <br />to all present that there would be <br />ample opportunity offered to all to <br />discuss background of some of the <br />positions arrived at by members of <br />the CAC at Council level. <br />'Commissioner Pons then spoke indica- <br />ting confusion as to what authority <br />'the staff has to modify recommenda- <br />tions made by the CAC .J Chairman <br />Pereira attempted to make that <br />'.,position clear for Commissioner Pons' <br />benefit. The Chairman stated that <br />all three groups (staff, Commission <br />.and CAC) has an obligation to Council <br />and while there will be differences,! <br />-9- <br />~~~~»~ <br />