Laserfiche WebLink
CITY of PLEASANTON <br />Planning Commission <br />MINt,~T~~1 ~QE REGUi_AR MEETING. <br />DC18 ; December 12, 1973 <br />Time ~ s:os P.M. <br />Plpce; Pleasanton Justice Court <br />jbe more prominently displayed. They <br />felt this wording should be shown on <br />the legend of the map. Senior Plan- <br />!ner Harris concurred, but thought <br />'that the exact wording should be lef <br />~to the discretion of the City Attor- <br />`~ ney . <br />\\ <br />\\\\\\\\ <br />A motion was offered by Commissioner Motion: <br />Garrigan, seconded by Commissioner Seconded: <br />McLain and carried, recommending that yes: <br />the last two sentences on Page 2 be Noes: <br />displayed within the legend of the sent: <br />map. stain: <br />Senior Planner Harris suggested that <br />the proposed extension to Kottinger <br />Park be removed and that this area <br />be put back in the single family <br />category. Chairman Pereira and Com- <br />missioner Garrigan both felt that <br />this park extension may not be re- <br />alistic, that it should be eliminated <br />on the other side of Pico Avenue and <br />that this be an area of specific <br />study. Commissioner McLain offered <br />the comment that the Commission <br />should not continue to emphasize <br />larger parks unless supervised <br />activity can be provided for them. <br />And this, should be geared to the <br />numbers of children who would be usin <br />the facilities. <br />The Chairman also felt that the park- <br />ing acquisition method should be <br />covered in the economic study. <br />A resolution was offered by Resolutic <br />Chairman Pereira accepting the land Seconded: <br />use element and land use map in Ayes• <br />concept. This was seconded by Com- Noes: <br />missioner McLain and unanimously Absent• <br />carried. Abstain: <br />-9- <br />X <br />I <br />X Xi <br />X ! X <br />XI <br />