My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 02/20/74
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1970-1979
>
1974
>
PC 02/20/74
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/30/2017 11:53:44 AM
Creation date
4/30/2007 3:32:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
2/20/1974
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 02/20/74
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
CITY of PLEASANTON <br />Planning Commission <br />SPECIAL <br />MIN~T~~ 0~ ~X ME~TIN(i', <br />QOt@ ; February 20, 1974 <br />Tiff~@ Z 8:05 P.M. <br />PIOC@t Veterans Memorial Building <br />the proposed regional center) with a <br />parking area of about 20 acres - <br />either the northern route going <br />easterly along Stoneridge Drive run- <br />ning north of the Val Vista develop- <br />ment, crossing Hopyard Road then over <br />to Station F on West Las Positas Blvd <br />west of Santa Rita Road, thence on to <br />Livermore, with undetermined stations <br />within the northerly section of that <br />city. <br />The southern route would run down <br />I-680, on the east side between the <br />freeway and the Alamo Canal to Bernal <br />Avenue, with Station J occurring near <br />the core area and then following the <br />SPRR tracks, continuing along Stanley <br />Boulevard into Livermore . <br />Mr. Blayney stated that in all pre- <br />vious meetings, no one spoke in favor <br />of the San Ramon corridor route, the <br />preference being for the Dublin Canyo <br />route. In Livermore, the dominant <br />opinion appears to be for the downtow <br />route. While he does not believe <br />Livermore's comments would affect <br />Pleasanton's choice of a route, there <br />are cost differentials, resulting <br />jfrom such a choice, which could <br />~~affect construction of the entire <br />,line. <br />'~, Some noise base maps were also pre- <br />sented . <br />!The alternatives offered for the <br />downtown would be either an aerial <br />structure, or a cut-and-cover subway <br />.entering west of WPRR, emerging at <br />Ray Street. SPRR would have to be <br />relocated to the WP rail road lines. <br />'The two projects would be simultane- <br />-2- <br /> <br />~\ <br />~~ ~~~ <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.