My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 03/13/74
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1970-1979
>
1974
>
PC 03/13/74
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/30/2017 11:53:40 AM
Creation date
4/30/2007 3:30:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
3/13/1974
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 03/13/74
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
'"'"'~ CITY of PLEASANTON <br />Planning Commission <br />MINUTES ~OF REGULAR MEETING. <br />Date ; March 13, 1974 <br />Time: s:os P.M. <br />fIGCe~ Pleasanton Justice Court <br />cient and well-run as it possible. <br />He stated that the C. C. & R.'s were <br />submitted to the City Attorney for <br />his review. <br />Discussion centered on the C. C. & <br />R.'s and what provisions would be <br />contained therein for homeowner dues <br />and increases when necessary for ex- <br />terior maintenance of the property. <br />Mr. Lewis indicated that the manage- <br />ment is operated under by-laws which <br />may be amended by a majority vote <br />of the homeowners, thus, if the funds <br />are insufficient for maintenance, <br />they may be increased upon approval <br />of the majority vote of the residents <br />Chairman Pereira asked if this is <br />FHA "boiler plate" and Mr. Lewis <br />answered no. <br />Another question brought up by the <br />Chairman was the legality of the <br />Planning Commission reviewing tenta- <br />tive maps in view of City Council <br />directive that they not review-any. <br />He wanted Council clarification on <br />this. Secretary Harris indicated <br />that a condominium conversion could <br />not in reality be considered in the <br />same vein as a tentative tract map, <br />since it would not affect the growth <br />pattern of the City. The Chairman <br />still felt that this is a possible <br />technical violation and requested <br />clarification on it from Council. <br />The Chairman requested and received <br />a reply of no as to whether the <br />units were to be resold under FHA. <br />Mr. Pereira stated that there have <br />been some recent requirements from <br />the State Department of Housing & <br />Community Development covering <br />-12- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.