My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 05/08/74
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1970-1979
>
1974
>
PC 05/08/74
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/30/2017 11:53:29 AM
Creation date
4/30/2007 3:28:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
5/8/1974
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 05/08/74
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
~" CIT'Y of PLEASANTON <br />Pian~ning Commission <br />MINUT~~ ~OF REGU _AR ME~TINq, <br />pQ~a = May 8 , 1973 <br />Time 8.15 P.M. <br />PICFO= Pleasanton Justice Court <br />--T- -~ <br />Mr. Walter Mills of the Graham=Hitch <br />Mortuary spoke to this application, <br />requesting favorable consideration. <br />Mrs. Bev Hamlin, resident of Wind <br />Cave Court in the Valley Trails <br />subdivision explained that she had <br />originally run a survey of resident <br />feeling toward this application. <br />.She stated that 518 people signed the <br />petition. There are possibly 950 <br />people in the tract in some 475 homes <br />some of which are vacant at this <br />time. Of this number, 211 people <br />were for the application and 307 <br />opposed. Some were not at home, <br />quite a few were undecided or did not <br />care. She did not take a poll of <br />the undecided vote. Also, she did <br />put up a sign inviting those who had <br />',questions to call her. She received <br />a flood of phone calls, most of <br />which were in favor of the mortuary <br />;being located in the area. But, <br />after canvassing within the area, <br />'and people becoming aware that <br />the rezoning and plan amendment would <br />encompass 3.1 acres, of which the <br />;mortuary would only use one acre, <br />!the feeling changed. <br />There being no further discussion, <br />the Public Hearing was closed. <br />Some confusion existed among the <br />Commissioners on the three points <br />made in the staff report. Discus- <br />sion followed, not only on these <br />three points, but on property value, <br />compatibility of uses and possible <br />reduction of density within the <br />remaining portion of the acreage. <br />-3- <br />\\ <br />\\~ <br />\\\\\ <br />»~»> <br />I ', <br />I I! ~, ~. <br />I I <br />...1. _ ,.. i L_ 1_ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.