My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 02/13/75
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1970-1979
>
1975
>
PC 02/13/75
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/30/2017 11:58:11 AM
Creation date
4/30/2007 3:12:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
2/13/1975
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 02/13/75
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
,,."'~ CITY of PLEASANTON <br />Planning Commission <br />MINUTES ~OF REGULAR MEETING. <br />Dote : February 13, 1975 <br />Time : 8:00 P.M. <br />PICCB: Pleasanton Justice Court <br />Acting Chairman McLain called Mr. <br />Vranesh's attention to one of the <br />conditions for approval, which <br />clearly states that no sewer is <br />available at this time. He also <br />advised Mr. Vranesl'~ to sometime <br />take a trip to City Hall and discuss <br />with staff the setback requirements <br />applicable to the different zoning <br />districts, in relation to the con- <br />cerns he expressed. <br />Next, Mr. Richard Burge spoke and <br />emphatically stated that in all his <br />dealings with staff, at no time was <br />he encouraged to apply for this PUD <br />revision. He stated that he is a <br />businessman, and took the calculated <br />risk of reinforcing the structure <br />of Building #4 of his own volition. <br />Commissioner Doherty indicated <br />interest in who the people were who <br />signed the petition. Also, he won- <br />dered about the "A" District imme- <br />diately west of the center. Some <br />discussion ensued on this point pri- <br />marily with Commissioner Carrigan, <br />as to how this land would be develop <br />with the commercial next door. <br />Commissioner Butler observed that <br />when he looked at this building <br />originally, he was concerned with <br />the bulk of the building with the <br />second-story added, but in reviewing <br />the bulk of the building in relation <br />to the two-story houses and other <br />buildings in the center, he now <br />believes that the bulk of this <br />building is quite small. Also, the <br />previous concerns of the Commission <br />regarding the shadow being cast, has <br />been answered. <br />-16- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.