My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 08/13/75
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
1970-1979
>
1975
>
PC 08/13/75
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/30/2017 11:55:30 AM
Creation date
4/30/2007 3:00:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
8/13/1975
DOCUMENT NAME
PC 08/13/75
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
4v$~-SAIV jDy <br />CITY of PLEASANTON <br />.~~ o <br />~:o Planning Commission <br />MINUTES ~OF REGULAR MEETING. <br />Dote ; August 13, 1975 <br />Time : 8:0o P.M. <br />PIOCe; Pleasanton <br />The Planning Commission could not mak <br />the finding that this use would not <br />change the character of a residential <br />neighborhood, and unless it is allowe <br />for a short period of time only to <br />give the applicant a chance to arrang <br />for a commercial location, they would <br />not be in a position to approve it. <br />ccordingly, <br />pproval for <br />dopted, with <br />resolution recommendin <br />x months was entered a <br />he following condition <br />(1) That the property address not be <br />contained in any advertising done fo <br />the business; (2) That no signs be <br />installed; (3) No customers go to th <br />property; (4) Business be part-time <br />only; (5) All regulations for the mo <br />ifications noted in the foregoing; <br />(6) That the business be allowed for <br />six months after which applicant wou <br />teed to reapply for extension or cea <br />operation. <br />Approved lanning Commission make finding that: Motion: <br />Modifications hanges in PUD-73-2, Valley Plaza, is Sec. <br />n conformance with originally approve' Ayes: <br />lanned unit development. Noes: <br /> Absent: <br />ecretary Harris explained that the Abstain: <br />riginally approved site plan showed <br />he outline of three restaurants, <br />quare footage of each and location <br />f parking. Its intent is to locate <br />Kentucky Fried Chicken, Pizza Hut <br />nd Jack-in-the-Box restaurants here. ,~ <br />his review is necessitated because <br />riginally, applicant did not know <br />hick restaurants would be locating <br />here. Now that this is known, and <br />he Kentucky Fried Chicken restaurant <br />-10- <br />Justice Court <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.